nunu

Members
  • Posts

    40
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by nunu

  1. Hello !

    i have only knowledges for home or pro version of resilio.

    There is no "user", only shared directory.

    So with home , you need to create a share per folder and provide keys to artist.

    I don't know if it is possible to get the user granularity that you need with small business or connect version. You should ask support for that.

  2. hi,

    at school in resilio GUI, check if you see your remote resilio peer.

    If not, maybe it is because your school network is behind a proxy / firewall.

    So, you need to go throught a proxy. Maybe open a web brower instance and check if you have a proxy configuration sets.

     

     

  3. Hi,

    here my concern :

    1. i have a NAS (master) with more than 10TB of data  with new files added each days
    2. i have smallest NAS (client) that can't synchronize all of the main NAS master data (not enough disk space)
    3. very most of time i need only latest files added on the master

     

    So what i would like to do, is through a script (bash?)  to be able to activate (on client) the download of latest file added on the master, BUT i would like to remove oldest one.

    For example i will virtually set a limite of 200Go on a shared directory (of subfolders),

    • i activated the download of latest file,
    • check that lastest files are downloaded (synced),
    • and then check space disk  taken in the directory and start to remove oldest files fo fit the quota limit.

    So i guess needs will be :

    • get the list and path of shared directories
    • activate sync & delete (locally) command
    • get the status of the transfert (sync OK, in progress)
    • ....

    is it possible to get some information about API ?  (family user licence)

     

    regards !

  4. Hi Andy+,

    do you know if resilio is still under developpement ? or if there is a major evolution under developpement (3.0)?

    As you said, maybe staff capacity is low, but this could not explain why there are no more communications about  the product !?

     regards

    nunu

     

     

  5. Hi,

    i made a test in advance power user preferences, i set < rate_limit_local_peers > to true,  then it works without any problem (expected rate limit reached).

    it seems that resilio considers the traffic to be local.

    Resilio is behind 2 chained routers, and i don't know if this could explain my issue.

    I have checked sync.log, but i haven't see anything particular.

     

    regards

     

  6. i got some issue with bandwidth throttling: it doesn't work.

    I used resilio pro 2.7.2 (1375), running on a Synology DS918+ with DSM 6.2.

    I try 2 way of throttling:

    • Global limit
    • Weekly schedule

    My maximum bandwidth are:

    • upload: 100 KB/s
    • download: 1.7 MB/s

     

    I know that sometime it could work...

     

    any idea  :)   ?

     

    regards.

  7. hi,

    i use resilio to get my personnal files up to date on my devices (smart phone, NAS, PC etc...). It works fine.

    But there is a case that is not covered : while you can't install resilio on the device (PC at office for example), you can't access to your files.

    So, could it be possible to add an other web port (80/443 etc...) that allows to download/upload/view files directly ?

    So there will be the current port to define share rules ( keys, share type etc...), and an other layer to allow a user(s) to access to theses files through web interface. 

    Regards

     

  8. Hi,

    Could it be possible to add the possiblity to encrypt a local sync folder throught the sync application (windows/linux/mac/android).

    All is protected thanks to encryption for transfer and untrusted node, but finally if we really want to have a end to end 100% secure, synced files need to be encrypted too on the hard drive (possibility to make the directory encrypted or not and possibility to change rules. Possibility to force all peers to have data encrypted on their local drive etc...)

    Synchronization should work if the directory is uncrypted or crypted.

    In fact it is to be protected against theft or to keep confidentialty.

    Regards, and thanks for the good work.

    nunu

     

  9. Hi,

    i made a try :

    devices : 1 PC and a smartphone android

    I have created an advanced shared directory and link both devices. I have synchronized a file : OK.

     

    From the smartphone, if i unlink the device i lost the advanced shared directory. While unlinking, a message is displayed to annonce that i will lost all advanced shared directory.

     

    I made the same test with a standard directory and it is OK : the share is kept ...

     

    Why advanced shared directories are lost ?

     

    regards

     

     

  10. Hi,

    with the new "businness model" i'am looking to reuse bittorent sync.

    But i have a question with what can be guarantee in term to compatibility with release 3.X ?

    For example : i buy an individual pro licence for 2.X. I want to share directories with a friend that uses a 3.X version (free or pro). I don't want to buy a new 3.X pro licence because new features doesn't interest me, so i keep my 2.X.

     

    1) Can bittorent guarantee that my 2.x will be able to sync with the 3.X ? (eventualy 2.X can be update to be compatible with 3.X).

    2) will there a possiblity to upgrade a pro 2.X licence to 3.X (price reduced compared to buy a new licence)

     

    That's a good news to have change the licence model.

     

    regards

    nunu

  11. Hi,

    first sorry for my english....

     

    I'am a little bit disappointed by the limitation of number of directories. And I hope that bittorent will change this ...

     

    I will never pay for a software all years. I pay for a software that offers me functionnalities that fit my needs 1 Time. And BTSYNC 1.X was this software. BTSync 2.X too, but  not with directories limitations.

     

    Take a look to teamviewer model : you have all functionnalities for home users for FREE, but for entreprise you need to pay.

     

    So just let free basic functionnalities like BTSYNC 1.X for home users and functionnalities with more admin stuffs etc... for the PRO version.

     

    i think that the plan of this limitation is "to force us to pay" because you think that we are too addicted to btsync which is a very good product. BUT i don't like this feeling, and it is like many things, nothing is irreplaceable even if, sometime,  it's not easy :)

     

    Or like i see sometimes, just allow home users to donate  to get a btsync 2.0 home users with no limitation . For good software, people donates.

     

    3 versions ?

    - FREE with limitations

    - Home users, with 1 shot donation with no limitation directories  + other functionnalities ?

    - PRO with a payment / years.

     

     

     

     

    it's a big shame :(