crash893

Members
  • Posts

    45
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by crash893

  1. I have a workgroup of about 12 people working on documents  10 of which work in a very bandwidth reduced area.

     

     

    the folder were work with is about 4.5 gigs 2,500 folders 3000 files

     

     

     

    I am wondering if I should split the folder into two different folders to keep the possibility of corruption of sync issues to a minimum

     

    Is there a "Sweet spot" in terms of size or file count / folder count i should be shooting for?

  2. I agree with ChrisH on this

     

    Why

     

    do you think someone is going to memorize a secret key over your shoulder in the 1 second you paste it into the window?

     

     

    the only argument for ******************* ing the password is because you have someone over your shoulder (which can easily be solved)

    or you have a malicious program doing screen shots or taking snapshots of your clipboard which if that is the case your system is compromised anyway so the point is still mute 

  3. >>>>Server Version<<<<

     

    Also it would be nice to have a way to quickly export and import config files (bonus would be to create the target folders if they don't already exist)

     

    So that if i wanted to bring a second sync server up all i have to do is export and import into the new server (or i could keep the config file for backup)

     

    I know you can get the config file out but it doesnt cover port setting or bandwith or creating the path so its still kind of a pain

     

    as always thanks for your great work

  4. Firs of all we need a suggestion box here !!

    Forum style is not good for wishlist dev !!

    I created one for this and they took a shit on it because they prefer the wishlist to be threaded. Apparently bit torrent as a larger entity has one they just haven't spun it up yet 

     

    I understand as bt sync is still very beta you might not want to flood the system before you actually have the inner working done right