• Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by iranzo

  1. For completeness, this was an issue that was being investigated and solved with a newer update (not sure if yet released)
  2. Was this finally an isolated issue or something more general is going to be provided?
  3. I'm experiencing (suffering) something similar, an encrypted folder is synced unencrypted to 3 hosts and encrypted to 5 more hosts. The 3 unencrypted can sync the whole set of folders and files ( ~ 158Gb), the other 5, at some point fail and stop to sync with similar messages: EU4FYUQHKNAO4MJGYCPYKSN3SVLIT73XRYQBYYY/OPVPZWOW5C6NQBRICAHUDSGD54/3KDQ4FMA5RYFMMJWLE4RDOUBVA/X4AHX4NRBNSLI5SWGQ7KCHEXOE/JQOOQTUW42VVYEIKCWA2UHORAXE7PIT2U4J4ZTBBX7MCLFMTYVGYDWR5IH636UF5ANYSTD57KA23O/2D2IYQ2DOUNBBZOCWXIOYNKQL4]: state:SEED error: meta:1 conns:1 io:0 [20170109 06:54:00.802] PC[0x00007f0d682a38e0][0x00007f0d607ecf80][] disconnect - reason: "Is seed", wb: 0, error: 0, ref: 0 [20170109 06:54:00.909] JOURNAL[8603]: Mutex file check failed with error : 103 [20170109 06:54:01.170] JOURNAL[8603]: Mutex file check failed with error : 103 [20170109 06:54:01.170] JOURNAL[4AB2]: Mutex file check failed with error : 100 with version 2.4.4 on all ends (some 32 bits, others 64) and a qnap running arm version of binary. I was able to start syncing from '0' on an encrypted peer (empty folder) until some point where it just stops and one of the curious things is that different hosts show different number of missing files to do a full sync. Have you figured out what's going on?
  4. Hi, I get something similar while running btsync on a kernel without ipv6 once I do "modprobe ipv6", btsync starts as expected. Regards, Pablo
  5. An option to see the diferences between local system and remote systems. From time to time I see some file count on one system and another one on remote, and I don't know why they are different An option to purge removed files on remote R/O syncs (as you're sure no longer need the backup for removed files) Proxy support Stealth mode to avoid appearing as downoading from a trackerless/unknown tracker bt client. Uservoice or similar to vote for already existing wishes
  6. So... there's any specific time frame to get this implemented? I would prefer http/https proxy, but even socks5 could do the trick. Thanks