tomdesinto

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    8

  • Joined

  • Last visited

tomdesinto's Achievements

New User

New User (1/3)

  1. tomdesinto
    For the Windows application, it would be nice to have a "clear history" button to clear the content of the "history" tab. sorry if that was already suggested, TL;DR
  2. tomdesinto
    1.2.73 does fix the issue described above. That was a impressively fast fix. Great work guys
  3. tomdesinto
    That is great news. I won't apply the work around and wait for the new version. That way I will be able to confirm the fix
  4. tomdesinto
    email sent
  5. tomdesinto
    my options are : no relay serverdon't use tracker serverdo search LAN and DHT networkuse predefined hosts (and on each of my btsync, I put the addresses of the others)I did set up TCP on LAN as well as I disabled encrypting data on LAN. But anyway how can any of that explain such a difference between 10ko/s and 3.5Mo/s ?
  6. tomdesinto
    I get slow downloads with the 1.2.x windows builds. If I use btsync 1.2.71 on Windows my average download speed is 10 ko/s with occasional spikes >500ko/s, while if I install back btsync 1.1.81, I get a solid 3.5 Mo/s download speed. My setup is as follow: Windows 7 64bit, Intel I7 920 + 9Go RAM hosted at homeRaspberrypi hosted at home running btsync 1.2.71Ubuntu 13.04 server Intel® Atom CPU D425 @ 1.80GHz, 2Go RAM, hosted on a datacenter, running btsync 1.2.71Ubuntu 13.04 server Intel® Atom CPU N2800 @ 1.86GHz, 4Go RAM, hosted on a datacenter, running btsync 1.2.71My home Internet connection can give me download speeds up to 2.5Mo/s. The linux x64 and ARM builds aren't the cause of the slowness as I can get good expected download rates when using 1.2.71 for all linux and ARM machines while using 1.1.81 on the windows machine. Only when the Windows machine uses the 1.2.x builds does it get slow download speed (even from the raspberrypi which is on the same LAN) Does anyone else experiences such slow speeds with 1.2.x compared to 1.1.x ?Is this a known bug ?Do you need me to try anything or submit logs to help figure out the root of the issue ? regards
  7. tomdesinto
    I had a similar issue and found out my harddrive was full. Maybe you are in this situation too
  8. tomdesinto
    I got this too on Ubuntu with btsync v1.1.82. Any hint ?