zbigb69

Members
  • Posts

    124
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by zbigb69

  1. This is wrong.

    Good argument

     

    Your mileage may vary. You can love it and we can choose NOT to love it.

     

    i understand, but if you just create an identity on each computer, then you are free to share a folder like on 1.4, so i don't see any problem in this new feature.

    So ok, you can choose not to love it, but you are free to use or NOT

     

    i don't know the expression in english, but "who can do more can do less".

    In that case it's true, you can choose to use 2.0 folders or 1.4 if you prefer.

     

    In my case, i have one identity, 3 computers, so this new way is ok. If i want to share with friends, family, or pro, i can just generate a full or temporary key, and it's like on 1.4

     

    really i can't see what's the problem cause you can choose the way you want

     

    And by the way, just shift clic on "+" to add folder, then you have a 1.4 folder the way you love ;)

    0e236b4e05.png 3d4e90f9cf.png

    So you do not even need to use the 2.0 folder

  2. Hello everyone,

     

    i understand all things i've read on this forum, with the new price etc...

    Like lots of people, i find that it's expensive for the job, like i tell on another post, some backup solutions are just a little more expensive, but they need storage etc. 

    Anyway i'm not here to talk about this.

     

    But i read that lots of people have problems to sync with this 2.0 version, but honnestly it does the job very well, people think that like it's not a beta anymore, there is no more problems, but hey do you know some software without update ?

     

    Ok 10 folders is limited, i'd prefer no limitation, or a personnal use cheaper and without have to pay every years, but i have no problems with this version. I always have problems with betas, and since 2.0 is out it's ok. I use 7 folders, with more than 2To sync, and all is ok.

     

    I don't like that you cannot know the status easily. But i like in folder there is no more ".sync" file, and there is a "bts" file with status of transfer.

    e35762ac87.jpg

     

     

    So ok i think like other people, they must adjust the price of pro version, and limitation of free, but why changing to another sync software ?

     

    Please if you have good arguments, explain to me, maybe i miss something, but for me this version is nice, and i don't plane to move to another. Pretty sure that if they move to a reasonable price i'll take the pro version.

     

    hope you like my english guys ;)

  3. I pay $40 this year to get a fully featured Sync 2.0 client -- great. What am I paying $40 for next year?

    i agree and I understand some of arguments i read on thoses pages.

    It's true that if the price would be lot cheaper, like 10$, i'm sure that all of people won't hesitate to pay, maybe even if a subscription.

    In my case, you're true, i am not ready to pay 40$ a year and every year, because we don't really know what is next step and free version is enough for me. I'm pretty sure i would pay for 2.0 for 10$ and 10$ more for 3.0 or other major update.

     

    Maybe staff have to make a step to users and users will follow btsync staff and support way more their work.

     

    i remerber sugar sync, a dropbox like, which tells users "warning we're going to update and it will cost xxx$, there is xx weeks remaining"

    BTsync should have do the same and asking community for what they would be ready to pay for, and what solution they'd like, subscription, pay once.

     

    I think a fix low price to start, and then each customer could put his own price above the fix price.

  4. If tomorrow i'll need more than 10 folders, i'm sure i will pay, cause i don't know any other program to do this so well.

    I would prefer 20€ anyway, but that's ok...

     

    Maybe staff should have warned it will be paid software and implement a survey to know how many users were willing to pay for this service.

    I don't really understand, cause almost everybody use dropbox for 1 folder and just few Go, and so what ? Some people pay for pro dropbox for 1 To !

     

    If you need more than 10 folders, maybe you need pro version because you are using it as a pro ;)

    So what is 35$ ?

  5. Hello everyone,

     

    i'd like to say that i don"t really understand what you people are saying.

    Before 2.0, i could have read lots of people that said "ok i would pay if need 'cause btsync is awesome !"

    Today 2.0 is out, and everybody cries "it's a shame blablabla".

    Come on, is everything in life is free ?

     

    Well, maybe for free version i would have put 20 folders, and i would have put the price as maybe 20$ a year, but what is really wrong with this new version ?

    10 folders is not so bad and honnestly do you know a better software to do all that stuff ?

    dropbox is 100$ a year for 1To.

    Myself i have 7 folders and almost 4 To sync with btsync, and today a would have no idea to what to use if i would uninstall btsync.

     

    Ok so maybe BTsync staff, please put something like 20 folders in free version, maybe reconsider the price a little bit cheaper, but please everyone are you really thinking 2.0 is as bad ?

    Or did i miss something in new version that really sucks ?

  6. Hello,

    i have an issue with this error.

     

    I have multiple folders on some discs.

    With two of them, i sometimes eject the disc, cause i need in another place.

    names are :

    1-Films

    2-Graph

     

    If i deconnect thoses discs, i have two error :

    1-Film "Folder not found" -> this one's ok

    2-Clips "Cannot identify the destination folder"

     

    so the first one is a normal error, but the second one is rename, if i double clic on it, the link is on another folder in another disc, where it shouldn't be, it just would be offline.

    So i have to remove the folder from bittorrent sync, and re add it. It's not long, but i have to do this each time i disconnect this particular disc.

     

    Is there a way to soluce it ?

     

    Btsync 1.4.11

    mac os yosemite

     

    thank you.

     

     

    post-33254-0-37035500-1423643375_thumb.p

  7. Hello,

    i have three folder on the same disk, and two of them are out of sync.

    The first sync has been ok, but since this first sync it's out of sync, even if it seems to sync some times.

     

    Is it an known issue, do you need log files ?

    it's the same on each machine

    i have the last version 1.4.110, but it was the same with previous.

    I had the two last folder few days ago, and the first folder a long time ago.

     

    Thanks you

     

    88ea57d74c.png