brubaker
-
Posts
13 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by brubaker
-
-
Thank you Helen,
This sounds reasonable. I will post an update here for you to learn about it too. WR
-
Hello,
I have a lot of read only users on this one 1.4.111 seeding machine.
Is there a way how I can migrate it to other hardware without having to re-add all users and them to delete and re-sync their stuff?
Does anyone know about where I could look for a how-to regarding this topic?
Thanks in advance.
-
Hi,
why isn't
Perfect Forward Secrecy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_Forward_Secrecy)implemented yet? The discussions about this security feature are long enough ongoing to recognize fmpov.
Regardsb
-
IPv6 Support.
-
+1 to IPv6 Support!
I have my desktop and laptop on the same network; the network is dual-stack configured and both hosts have working IPv4 and IPv6 connectivity.
A tcpdump shows that btsync is only using IPv4 for communications though.
What is the state of IPv6 support?
(Apologies if this has been covered elsewhere, I did do a search but only found side-mentions of IPv6, and one other unanswered question about IPv6 support)How did you do that with tcpdump?
-
+bump
-
Wow! Thank you both for completely answering my questions.
One last question: Is BTSync itself ready for IPv6?
Regards,
brubaker
-
Hi,
I am running Debian Wheezy 32 bit on a VPS with a static IPv6 address. Apache2 without ssl is running and up as well as reachable from the outside via webbrowser.
I can't figure out why the hack I can't access the http://[ipv6]:8888/gui webGUI from BTSync. Netstat -tulpn shows a running process and I dpkg-reconfigured it.
Any hints? It there IPv6 support at all? What could I do if no native IPv6 support was build in to make it run?
A native German tongue asking kindly,
bru
-
Hello nils,
thank you for coming up with an solution. I will definitely take a look like you mentioned into it and coming back to verify or to neglect my "claim".
-
It even still worked if I changed the full access key for some users to revoke access to other but hey, they nevertheless they "all" got the files.
Please see my thread: http://forum.bittorrent.com/topic/25403-revoked-changed-full-access-secret-but-still-sharing-files/?hl=access
-
-
Hello!
first things first: Thank you very much for BTsync! I really love it and use it privately more and more!
Now my "problem" (I searched for "renew" and "revoke" in this forum already):
I have a bunch of people with read-only access to files. One of them must be removed for reasons. I re-generated a new Full access secret and distributed new r/o keys to all the others. But it seems to me the person I want to be excluded is still getting traffic?!
Any hints to this BTsync behavior? Any help is appreciated!
Warm regards from Germany Happy X-Mas!
brubaker
[Solved] Quick question regarding 1.4.111 Windows migration with users
in Sync General Discussion
Posted
Both options worked.