citronbleu
-
Posts
11 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by citronbleu
-
-
Thanks @Helen : ticket #41739 created
Have a good day !
-
Hi @Roman Z
Thanks for your feedback. I have several RO folders synced :
- Folder 1 : 160 GB, 25 000 files
- Folder 2 : 30GB, 16 000 files
- Folder 3 : 13GB, 800 files
- Folder 4 : 22GB, 4 000 files
What kind of information can I provide to Support team if you this this is not normal to have this sort of behaviour ?
Thanks !
-
Hello @Roman Z
I've probably the same issue than @VDub currently with a Raspberry Pi B (the first one). I'm running Sync 2.3.5 (latest at the moment). I'm indexing several important folders stored on a 3.5 USB drive (with external power supply). Pi CPU usage is important for the btsync program (80%), and it's the same for the Mem usage. The Btsync app crash after approx 1h. No other apps are running on this Pi.
Kern.log contains :
kernel: [1876371.227781] Out of memory: Kill process 30420 (btsync) score 818 or sacrifice child
kernel: [1876371.227805] Killed process 30420 (btsync) total-vm:570284kB, anon-rss:385016kB, file-rss:504kBDo you know if the performances are really different with btsync and the new Pi3 ?
Thanks !
-
Thanks Wweich ; I've got my answer, that's not a good news for me !
-
Thanks SenorLoco, it's works for me too ! Stored on /Users/<me>/Library/Application Support/BitTorrent Sync/License/189xxx, v2.0.93 / Mac
-
Drego85> Thanks for your reply. In my opinion, Bittorent Sync is better without Web Interfa ce (in my case). I'm using a Raspberry Pi that is indexing a shared folder stored on a NAS (mounted with NFS protocol). I know this solution is not technically perfect but it worked finewith with BTSync 1.4 (without web interface).
-
Hi All
I've a couple of workstations running Bittorent Sync 2.0 (Mac, Windows, etc) with web interface. But I've a Linux server running at the moment Bittorent Sync 1.4 with config file (without web interface).
Can I use Bittorent Sync 2.0 with a confg file too ? How can I generate a 2.0 secret key with command line ?
BitTorrent Sync 2.0.93
Usage:
btsync [ options ... ]
Options:
--nodaemon Do not daemonize
--dump-sample-config Print a sample configuration file
--log <file> Set log file
--webui.listen <IP>:<port> Set the webui listening interface
--generate-secret Generate a read/write key
--get-ro-secret <r/w key> Get the read-only key associated to a read/write key
--help Print this message
--config <path> Use a configuration fileSo,
./btsync --generate-secret
-> 1.4 key beginning with A3T7 ...How can I share a 2.0 folder from my Windows/Mac worskstation to read only mode on my Linux server (with config file) ?
Thanks for your help !
-
Hi,
How can I activate "Overwrite any changed files" using config file on a BTSync node without web GUI?
I'm trying to resolve some Out of sync issue between several nodes.
Thanks a lot!
-
RomanZ> i've sent support request with debug logs about my behavior with Raspberry. Request #9751. It's not working since i've updated my btsync to 1.3.77, then 1.3.87, then 1.3.93 ... i've downgraded to 1.2.92 and it's working fine now
Thanks for your help
-
Switch back to 1.2.92, all sync if 2 minutes...
with 1.3.90, Not sync in 24h
It's approximately the same here with BTSync 1.3.x and later. Now it's working fine with this setup :
- 1 MacOS 10.7.4 / 1.3.86 with a couple of R/W sync local folder (30 000 files)
- 1 MacOS 10.7.4 / 1.3.86 with a couple of R/W sync local folder (15 000 files)
- 1 Windows XP SP3 / 1.3.8x with one R:W sync local folder (10 000 files)
- 1 Debian 7 x64 - OVH K2G / 1.3.86 with a couple of R/O sync folder (stored on EXT4 internal storage)
- 1 Raspberry (Raspbian up to date) 1.2.92 with a few R/O sync folder (stored on NFS share)
- 1 Raspberry (Raspbian up to date) 1.2.92 with a few R/O sync folder (stored on EXT4 USB disk)
Each time I updated my Raspi from 1.2.9x to 1.3.x it never synced anymore, sometimes waiting approx one week to be sure it's not a performance limitation with Raspi ... but no. I've downgraded to 1.2.92 and it's working fine again.
Thanks a lot for your product, it's really good and i'm pretty sure that it's goind to be perfect in a few month !
[Now Implemented!] Bandwidth/sync Scheduling
in Feature Requests
Posted
+1 too