cdaou

Romanz, thanks for updating the KB. it probably works fine on linux, but I have yet to find a way to have it on windows. the cygwin version I get with openssh version for example does not seem to generate hash version, or I have not found how. I will update my topic if I find something. C

Romanz, I fully understand the plain text issue, that's why I was looking at the hashing. thank for your answer. I will look into that and see if I can figure it out. too bad there is no wiki for that, it would really be helpfull Cheers, C

Dear all, sorry for my ignorance, but I have been trying to use a hash password in the conf file. Webui section "listen" : <IP: port> For example, 0.0.0.0:8888 will listen to any interface on the LAN at port 8888. To disable WebUI, remove this field "Login" and "Password" - allow you to set credentials. "password_hash" - allows you to enter password hash in crypt(3) format. using a plain password is easy, but I was wondering about the hashed version, 1. is it safer ? I mean does it make sense to use it or reverting it is a simple task ? 2. how can I hash a password (either in windows or an online generator as I don't have a linux machine hanging around) thanks for any help/clarification/recommandation you could provide C.

see this topic in the feature request and an way to trick your way into that in the meantime has been proposed by Galonsor : link cheers, C

GreatMarko, thank you

I have to say that I am hoping big time for this feature to. and I also own a pro license which I would like to be able to use on all my nodes. as of now it is not too problematic as the read-only node has less than 10 shared folders so I simply unlinked it and I manually added the shares.. but it will be an issue at the moment I need to breach this limit other than that thanks for the great tool. C

GreatMarko, thank you for the very quick response. although I have to admit I don't like the idea I understand that I have to go for this way now. I will see how I can split my folder sharing for the time being to be honest I don't really mind yet as the secondary device which needs read only access does not (yet) need more than 10 shares. but I sure hope this will be solved by the time so I can re-link it to my pro account. do you know if the feature is planned ? or should I head to the appropriate forum to request it ? cheers, C

hello everyone, I am a little bit confused. I used v1.x for a little while and I cannot seem to wrap my mind on how v2.x is working. (to avoid hearing any comments saying you must have a pro license to enjoy all the features let me start by saying I have one) so in the previous version there was no "owner", nor link between the different devices. now I am facing an issue. I have a few devices (windows and synology), and I used to share some folders with read/write, but other with read only permission. this allowed me to have a repository from which all my devices were getting files but nothing could happen "by mistake" without direct access to the "source" files... now I do not seem to be able to replicated this. all the folders that I am adding to one device gets displayed directly on the other devices (disconnected). if I connect them they always get full ownership.. I tried adding them using the share folder, hoping to bypass the connect option, but it looks like btsync realises that the folder is my own and connects it with full ownership... anyone can enlighten me ? will I have to disconnect my devices from each other and add them using the share folder option or is there an option I missed. I hope I am clear. thanks for any help, C.