thejae

I have the same issue, it has been happening for months. I've been hoping for a fix. As a personal user who bought 3 licenses for each computer, this is pretty inconvenient. Device: Synology DS1513+ with DSM 5.2-5644 Update 5

I see... the original config value was set to "false" and we'd still see files being move to .sync/Archive. It was probably the "Store deleted files in folder archive" that was still checked. Will try again. Thanks!

Hi guys, am using Btsync for servers file replication and we'd really love to have deleted files removed across all our servers instead of moving them into a .Sync/Archive folder. I tried setting this to true but doesnt seem to work "folder_defaults.delete_to_trash".

I requested an API key 1 month ago and I haven't received it. zOMG! Has my request been denied? I even described the amazing things we are doing with Btsync here http://forum.bittorrent.com/topic/32216-geo-load-balancing-data-replication-alternative/

File replication is directly related to the post I posted in User Stories a while ago: http://forum.bittorrent.com/topic/32216-geo-load-balancing-data-replication-alternative/ I am so happy to hear BTSync will look into server usage. Thumbs up!

We have been experimenting with btsync (somebody casually mentioned you guys on spiceworks.com) as an opensource alternative to commercial file replication solutions. For this project, we are developing a financial platform with geo-balancing configuration spread across datacentres on major continents. We are catering to users worldwide. The Snowden affair has really shaken up things, so data security is a main concern. Our main criteria is: - Virtually no performance impact (our team's target is <1% CPU Usage). - High performance file sync. - Encryption that breaks government agencies. We are talking NSA, China and Mother Russia. - Easily deployed on new nodes. - Set it and forget it. If we were using Windows, MS DFS would have been the default choice. Sadly enough, Azure and Amazon AWS aren't present in the regions we want. And on Linux, rsync is kind of primitive, there is no out of the box encryption - it takes some effort to configure it to transfer data securely. Our current config is: - Ubuntu. - 10 active instances. - Multi-site. We are finalizing our tech stack this coming week. Let's see how its been performing. I am wondering whether btsync creators ever imagined the implications of this software in the enterprise world.

Sorry to bump this old topic. But i'd be interested in an official btsync package for Synology.