Andy+

Sorry, I´m not Resilio, see point one Contact support and ....

Its a rule, see above. I think is also after v2.7 and if not clear, is better to contact support.

There are the 3 columns in the GUI Date added Date synced Last transferred If these 3 columns are activated, the labels are always present, but the columns Date synced and Last transferred seem to mix. After 1-2 minutes, the column content for Date added disappears and the content for Date synced and Last transferred are indented to the left. There seems to be a bug here.

That is possible. All you have to do is right-click in the row with the column labels. Then a window opens in which you can activate columns that you want to see. There are also 3 columns regarding dates and times. Choose what you want and click on the column you want to sort.

First of all, what I did is just a guess. Well, I suspect that the developers of course didn't just think in terms of keys and bits or bytes, but also humanly. We as humans recognize names and things like that. And that's how it is for me here with Resilio. Then when I say an administrator recognizes any names in the local network, I assume that an administrator knows his network and what he is doing. When I say that external connections cannot be fully monitored, I mean that when I distribute a peer key, surely I know who I am distributing it to, but not what names or computer IDs are associated with them when connections are made based on the distributed keys.

I think the developer has considered that the administrator knows what names or labels are used. Of course, it gets complicated when content is shared between internal and unknown exteral devices and two identical names happen to come into connection with it. In this respect, it would be a feature request for me that the software also generates a unique key from the input, e.g. from computer names and the entered identity name or something like that.

Which version of Resilio is running? Normally you see on your clients the rsls files as placeholder and to work with them. Maybe is a setting issue on your clients? What kind of clients you are using?

Okay. Because some points are different to my Windows 10 Pro. I think, your instructions are in the Home Version or the Build is not the actual 1909. I have the same effect, that Resilio doesnt find the internal LAN devices without Internet. This is not good.

Maybe make a manually installation https://www.resilio.com/individuals/ https://help.resilio.com/hc/en-us/articles/206178924 If possible to install Docker, is also easy to use a Docker version of Resilio.

Which licenses are running on your different devices?

Which Windows version and build you have?

Its better to send more informations. Screenshots. Logs etc. from the FreeNAS device. Also no GUI, running service etc.? Your message say nothing about.

No response from Resilio?

Don't confuse it now. Syncthing has the feature, Resilio doesn't.

As a user, I cannot imagine that there will be a special solution from Resilio for this. FritzOS is a Linux derivative and so maybe you can take one of the packages from Resilio and integrate it into FritzOS. There are also special forums and webpages, e.g. https://freetz.github.io/wiki/packages.html, that deal with these topics and modding. You will surely have to experiment yourself.

In many times I use my computers and Smartphones in a company environment, which are restricted and closed. Mainly the ports 80 and 443 are open and requests to open the ports 3000 or such like that is not accepted by the IT departments. Since Resilio's Relay servers do not work with ports 443 and 80, I'm forced to evade. Either I then use a ownCloud portable client or Syncthing, since the former already uses web-based only these ports and the second can provide corresponding Relays with these ports 443 and 80. In all the companies I can not change anything, not even the firewalls. But - I'm allowed to use: http:// (port 80) and https:// (port 443). So I'm allowed to use the software that works on it. So the networks are usually restrictive and allow only certain protocols and thus often enough only http:// (port 80) and https:// (port 443), only a few is more open and even UPnP ports can be opened and Resilio will run as well. But that's more the exception. For that is not possible to influence the router configuration in the "external" locations. Because my favorite Resilio is not working, I dodge to Syncthing, ownCloud, and nextCloud. Syncthing I take because it basically works more or less as well as Resilio and this has the consequence, that I have to use Syncthing for the same directories in addition to Resilio, that's not very clean, but in principle it works with a few special ignore settings. This things are also discussed in other threads, but without result. The current relays and manual settings etc. doesnt work. But it would be better if Resilio could be operated with relay servers with the ports 443 and 80.

To have a better overview, what is ongoing, it would be better, to have the DETAILS not inside of "Info", but outside in the list of peers with little letters, so maybe beside and under of the "Peers: X". This modification maybe is possible with v2.7.0 together with bug fixes etc.?

Is such feature interessting fore Resilio?

No comment from Resilio side?

I had the same problem. I could no longer register clients on the master profile. I stopped the services on all clients, deleted the databases and restarted. It is comparable to doing a clean installation. So, connect clients, connect peers to the directories. Then it went perfectly. Since then, my Android app has worked perfectly, which was not the case before.

As a loyal and long-time user of Resilio, previously BTsync and also a very convinced user, I would like to say: At this point I suggest analyzing the forum as not all bugs have been fixed yet with v2.7.0. It would also be good if the update cycles e.g. monthly or quarterly, the users, including myself, would again provide more concrete information about errors or bugs. It was a lot of work to revive this already dead forum, which is admittedly also fun. For the updates, I therefore rather suggest small and smallest steps compared to updates once a year and then solutions for alle the bugs or functions are still missing finally. I don't want to take your keenest competitor as an example, but if you want your loyal customers and community to be complete again, take care of them because they are gradually migrating. All you have to do is visit the forum there.

This is not a problem of Resilio, is a problem of the DSM APP Universal Search. The root cause is (sentence found in DSM Help - Media Indexing): "Multimedia files added to indexed folders via the NFS or SCP protocol will not be scanned automatically. To index such files, click Re-index". It means, after Indexing you also see the images.

I use Resilio on all my Windows 10 computers without problem, but is installed as service. Maybe test also the service, if runs. If yes, is maybe only a GUI problem with the Traytool you have not with the service installation. With that you have only the browser GUI.

Resilio should now really introduce a regulation, the uncertainty is present.

Admittedly, after the multi-page debate on this problem, I also would now expect a official statement from Resilio how to deal with this problem in a final and fair manner. There should be an official regulation. Only talk about doesn't help anything if Resilio doesn't make any commitments. If I were a user of Windows Server and my licenses suddenly stopped working, I would also be angry.