BensTech

Members
  • Content Count

    32
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About BensTech

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I've already downgraded. Someone else with disconnecting peers can report this issues.
  2. Bad news... this problem has returned in 2.6.0. I'm seeing this behaviour on Windows and QNAP NAS clients. I've downgraded to QNAP NAS client 2.5.12 and the issue disappeared. Planning to downgrade Win client to 2.5.12 on WIndows as well. This sucks!
  3. Upgrading to 2.6.0 has a "loading bar" now so on large sync sets, you can see the bar slowly move over but at least there is SOMETHING to make you realize things are loading.
  4. I wish I understood what you wrote Gane, but I don't. Can you try again?
  5. Is that true even if under Power user preferences, you set the following? Doesn't this setting apply to ALL folders. So, I could disable LAN encryption. Or are you referring to something else? lan_encrypt_data to FALSE
  6. I'm not concerned about the changes on the 2nd nodes. Remember, SPEED is my concern. Someone in support told me that "Standard" folders are faster than "Advanced" . I'm currently running Advanced. So... their exact words " Also I would advice you to use Standard folders instead of Advanced as they much faster." Is that true?
  7. I want MORE speed. I have 2 active file servers in 2 different sites that currently does syncing (RW) between. I've had a # of problems with Resilio (2.5.10 [upgraded to 2.5.12 and same issue]) where it'll lose the "sync status" and run a full verify/rehash which takes about 2 weeks which is INSANE. The "big" sync folder is 1.03TB, 584k files, 202k folders. I'm looking to add a 2nd peer in both sites, so if this happens again, it'll run a resync from the same site over 1Gb connections than 100Mb VPN which sadly peaks at about 2Mb since I have "too man small files" per support. Should the 2nd peer in each site be Read Only, or is Read/Write a better approach? I'm considering this: OPTION 1 Site 1 = RW Peer & Read Only Peer Site 2 = RW Peer & Read Only Peer OPTION 2 Site 1 = RW Peer & RW Peer Site 2 = RW Peer & RW Peer That way if something happens to the RW Peer in either site, it can quickly re-sync via the R Peer. Any comments? Thanks,.
  8. Sadly "Sync Support" missed your final idea which will WORK. So, bring your system over to your friend's place or vice versa and run sync and then once it's in sync, you can take it offsite and continue syncing.
  9. MTU is a factor going through a firewall with and without VPN. Sure there is SOME overhead with vpn, but allow WAN acceleration in the LAN or WAN setting. Makes no sense to restrict it. And there was a Resilio article that talked about improving sync performance by disabling encryption. So, it seems we have a conflict here. Right now I'm doubtful until I see #"s that WAN acceleration works with low latency high speed connections. That's what I have. -Ben
  10. I have 2 Win 2012 R2 Server end points (24GB memory each) connected via 100Mb VPN tunnel. From my testing, I haven't noticed any differences with and without WAN Acceleration enabled. Are others seeing similar or different? WAN Acceleration feedback would be appreciated. My Setup 2 x Windows 2012 R2 Resilio w/24GB memory (using only about 1.1GB) Resilio 2.5.10 as a service Resilio LAN encryption OFF 869k+ Files 1.58TB+ Sync Amount
  11. The SOURCE Peer is uploading to the TARGET Peer which is downloading. Notice from my screenshot, that upload shows 3.2KB/s and the download is 9.3MB/s. Looks like a bug to me. CORRECTION: This sync folder has 3 peers. I'll re-run the test. The 3rd peer is on a VERY slow circuit. I'll bet the same issue will occur. SOURCE is running 2.5.8 (Windows) TARGET is running 2.4,4 (Windows)
  12. Resilio support offering me to beta test some internal build of 2.5 to see if it fixes the "disappearing peers". No thanks on beta testing a version. I downgraded to 2.4.5 and my setup (2 peers over VPN tunnel w/using predefined and just the Search LAN) instantly started working again. I'm still waiting for the working 2.4.5 index/syncing to catch up for about 5-6 days of outage. I'm still pissed about that.
  13. Resilio support contacted me on Wed, almost 24 hrs from this Tue post, and 5 days LATER from the original ticket opening offering me to beta test some internal build of 2.5 to see if it fixes the "disappearing peers". No thanks on beta testing a version. I'm still waiting for the working 2.4.5 index/syncing to catch up for about 5-6 days of outage. I'm still pissed about that.
  14. Yes, but not using Resilio. Resilio cannot sync any open files (e.g. docx, txt, pst, ost, etc). I'd recommend you look to use a backup solution and then use Resilio to sync that. There are many tools. Some even allow for automated scheduled PST backups such as Safe PST Backup from 4Team. Google that.
  15. The version of Resilio which was experiencing this issue was Windows 2.5.7 64 bit edition. There's no way I'm upgrading ANY of my systems (Windows, Mac, QNAP) which running well under 2.4.x to 2.5.x until Resilio documents it's fixed in their future release notes and folks stop reporting problems in the forums. These forums are more valuable than support, which is sad.