Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'nat'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Resilio Sync
    • Sync General Discussion
    • Sync Troubleshooting
    • Sync for NAS (Network Attached Storage)
    • Sync Stories
    • Developers
    • Feature Requests

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Interests

Found 6 results

  1. Hallo, as I haven't found an answer to this question I'll just try it here. My assumption is that the "Sync with..." status of peers is chaining such that peers appear as synced (and online) even though this information is only available through one of the peers. Can somebody confirm that? Let me explain my setup. I am using BitTorrent Sync without tracker and relay server. Those are disabled for every folder on every machine and instead predefined hosts are used to talk to the other peers. I am using two 24/7 linux servers behind a NAT-router without upnp where only one of the servers has the BitTorrent Sync port forwarded through the router firewall. Currently me and my MacBook are in a totally different city. I resolve the mentioned NAT router through DynDns and only added the forwarded port to the predefined host list of the MacBook client. Interestingly I can see 2 relays synced (and online) even though my MacBook should only be able to talk with 1. I'd love to see this chaining feature confirmed. Or is there something I am missing? -- ankoh
  2. Hello btsync have wrong implementation of upnp. It works only on networks without routers between network segments. In our case we have follow network organization: Whole network is: 192.168.1.0/24 This network is divided to subnetworks with 64 host in each other. Now we have 3 subnetworks 192.168.1.0/26 192.168.1.64/26 192.168.1.128/26 subnetworks 192.168.1.64/26 and 192.168.1.128/26 join to 192.168.1.0/26 with routers. In 192.168.1.0/26 we have gateway(192.168.1.1) to global network. On that gateway work nat, nd upnp server, and btsync client placed in subnetwork 192.168.1.64/26. When btsync starts it send multicast SSDP discovery(we see this throw wireshark): M-SEARCH * HTTP/1.1 HOST: 239.255.255.250:1900 ST:upnp:rootdevice MAN:"ssdp:discover" MX:3 and gateway response to it: HTTP/1.1 200 OK CACHE-CONTROL: max-age=120 ST: upnp:rootdevice USN: uuid:75802409-bccb-40e7-8e6c-60a44c67052b::upnp:rootdevice EXT: SERVER: RT-N56U/3.0.3.8 UPnP/1.1 MiniUPnPd/1.8 LOCATION: http://192.168.1.1:47984/rootDesc.xml OPT: "http://schemas.upnp.org/upnp/1/0/"; ns=01 01-NLS: 1 BOOTID.UPNP.ORG: 1 CONFIGID.UPNP.ORG: 1337 But btsync just ignore this, and doesn't discovers service list: http://192.168.1.1:47984/rootDesc.xml, which have <deviceType>urn:schemas-upnp-org:device:InternetGatewayDevice:1</deviceType> As a result no any port are opened.
  3. Hi. I would like to sync my raspberry pi with my ubuntu Laptop. For this task i would want to create a ssh tunnel from the ubuntu laptop to the pi. How could i do that, my bittorrent sync traffic would go through this tunnel and start finding my pi as a device? I could also use a vpn, but i would appreciate to use the ssh method. Thanks
  4. My setup is for folders only synced by predefined hosts. Every time I choose a new folder, it has relay servers, tracker servers, and LAN searching on. Instead, I want any folder I create to have my predefined hosts and all these options turned off. Hell, at this point I'd be happy to create a folder that had NONE of these settings activated. Is there something I can adjust to alter what are considered the "default" properties for added sync folders? Thanks for the help.
  5. OK folks - "seasoned network administrator" here. I've been hoping to use BTSync to share some business-related files & directories from my employer's systems, to let their clients more easily access some data, etc. But I've run into an 'Unexpected behavior!' I set up the 'server' - Windows 2008 R2 with BTSync, and share the folder. I've also set a custom 'listen port' and performed a MANUAL NAT / port forward. When the client (who is behind NAT and is *not* supporting uPNP) connects, they get a low, low speed of around 50kilobytes/second, even though the client's download pipe is many, many times that, and the server's upload pipe is many times that as well. When reviewing the open connections on each end, I could see that the 'client' was in fact NOT connecting directly to the 'server.' Is there a reason that the 'relay' servers were being used, even though there was the ability for at least a one-way direct connection? (Yes, I've tested the direct connection, by telnetting to the remote system on the custom port, and I was able to establish a connection). The configuration is fairly normal. Both systems are behind NAT firewalls. The "server" has the custom BTSync port forwarded to it. The expected behavior - direct connection from 'client' to 'server' did not happen. Why? I'm confused. Also, in the logs, I saw the following unexpected entries. Note that port "34780" is *not* the port I used - I in fact specified port 61223 - the 'lan port' it's trying to connect to is the right one, but the port it's trying to connect on the actual WAN interface is very wrong! [2014-02-13 12:59:01.296] ping xxWAN.IPxx.253.205:34780 directly[2014-02-13 12:59:01.296] ping yyLAN.IPyy.63.13:61223 peer local address[2014-02-13 12:59:02.296] Sending broadcast ping for share 5678obfuscatedshare500[2014-02-13 12:59:02.296] Sending broadcast ping for share 0123ObfucsatedShare012300071[2014-02-13 12:59:02.296] Send ping to peer (01234567obfuscatedpeer000C99) for share 0123ObfucsatedShare012300071:[2014-02-13 12:59:02.296] ping xxWAN.IPxx.253.205:34780 directly[2014-02-13 12:59:02.296] ping yyLAN.IPyy.63.13:61223 peer local address[2014-02-13 12:59:03.296] Sending broadcast ping for share 5678obfuscatedshare500[2014-02-13 12:59:03.296] Sending broadcast ping for share 0123ObfucsatedShare012300071[2014-02-13 12:59:03.296] Send ping to peer (01234567obfuscatedpeer000C99) for share 0123ObfucsatedShare012300071:[2014-02-13 12:59:03.296] ping xxWAN.IPxx.253.205:34780 directly[2014-02-13 12:59:03.296] ping yyLAN.IPyy.63.13:61223 peer local address[2014-02-13 12:59:04.297] Sending broadcast ping for share 5678obfuscatedshare500[2014-02-13 12:59:04.297] Sending broadcast ping for share 0123ObfucsatedShare012300071[2014-02-13 12:59:04.297] Send ping to peer (01234567obfuscatedpeer000C99) for share 0123ObfucsatedShare012300071:[2014-02-13 12:59:04.297] ping xxWAN.IPxx.253.205:34780 directly[2014-02-13 12:59:04.297] ping xxWAN.IPxx.253.205:34780 via relay[2014-02-13 12:59:04.297] ping yyLAN.IPyy.63.13:61223 peer local address
  6. I've been able to setup BitTorrent Sync locally, but I'm having trouble getting my router to work with it. In my logs I see "Requesting peers from tracker 0.0.0.0:0 via UDP" but it says it "Got 3 tracker ips" along with 2 relay IPs. [2013-12-27 20:28:36.527] Got 2 relay ips[2013-12-27 20:28:36.527] ip 67.215.231.242:3000[2013-12-27 20:28:36.527] ip 67.215.229.106:3000[2013-12-27 20:28:36.527] Got 3 tracker ips[2013-12-27 20:28:36.527] ip 54.225.100.8:3000[2013-12-27 20:28:36.527] ip 54.225.196.38:3000[2013-12-27 20:28:36.527] ip 54.225.92.50:3000 Any idea why it is not using one of the three tracker IPs for the requesting peers? I'm not sure if this is my problem, but I can post the full log file if needed. I am using Sophos UTM as a firewall / router. I've allowed any UDP 3000 traffic, and port forwarded the listening port to the system running BitTorrent Sync. Thanks for any help.