Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'nat'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Resilio Sync
    • Sync General Discussion
    • Sync Troubleshooting
    • Sync for NAS (Network Attached Storage)
    • Sync Stories
    • Developers
    • Feature Requests

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Interests

Found 7 results

  1. Product Resilio Sync Pro 2.6.3 (1340) Pro - as in 5 user license/subscription. Platform(s) : Ubuntu 19.10, Ubuntu 18.04, FreeNAS 11.2 (but also a Win10 laptop at work - happy to leave this out of the equation). Okay - I've done various searches but unable to find more specific information I'm looking for. Everything was working "tickety-boo" in 2018, till my employer started blocking a "vast" range of anything to anywhere TCP/UDP ports... I'm on good terms with one of the Network administrators, and he gave me a list of TCP ports open to "anywhere", e.g. armed with this in
  2. Hallo, as I haven't found an answer to this question I'll just try it here. My assumption is that the "Sync with..." status of peers is chaining such that peers appear as synced (and online) even though this information is only available through one of the peers. Can somebody confirm that? Let me explain my setup. I am using BitTorrent Sync without tracker and relay server. Those are disabled for every folder on every machine and instead predefined hosts are used to talk to the other peers. I am using two 24/7 linux servers behind a NAT-router without upnp where only one of the servers h
  3. Hello btsync have wrong implementation of upnp. It works only on networks without routers between network segments. In our case we have follow network organization: Whole network is: 192.168.1.0/24 This network is divided to subnetworks with 64 host in each other. Now we have 3 subnetworks 192.168.1.0/26 192.168.1.64/26 192.168.1.128/26 subnetworks 192.168.1.64/26 and 192.168.1.128/26 join to 192.168.1.0/26 with routers. In 192.168.1.0/26 we have gateway(192.168.1.1) to global network. On that gateway work nat, nd upnp server, and btsync client placed in subnetwork 192.168.1.64/26.
  4. Hi. I would like to sync my raspberry pi with my ubuntu Laptop. For this task i would want to create a ssh tunnel from the ubuntu laptop to the pi. How could i do that, my bittorrent sync traffic would go through this tunnel and start finding my pi as a device? I could also use a vpn, but i would appreciate to use the ssh method. Thanks
  5. My setup is for folders only synced by predefined hosts. Every time I choose a new folder, it has relay servers, tracker servers, and LAN searching on. Instead, I want any folder I create to have my predefined hosts and all these options turned off. Hell, at this point I'd be happy to create a folder that had NONE of these settings activated. Is there something I can adjust to alter what are considered the "default" properties for added sync folders? Thanks for the help.
  6. OK folks - "seasoned network administrator" here. I've been hoping to use BTSync to share some business-related files & directories from my employer's systems, to let their clients more easily access some data, etc. But I've run into an 'Unexpected behavior!' I set up the 'server' - Windows 2008 R2 with BTSync, and share the folder. I've also set a custom 'listen port' and performed a MANUAL NAT / port forward. When the client (who is behind NAT and is *not* supporting uPNP) connects, they get a low, low speed of around 50kilobytes/second, even though the client's download pipe is
  7. I've been able to setup BitTorrent Sync locally, but I'm having trouble getting my router to work with it. In my logs I see "Requesting peers from tracker 0.0.0.0:0 via UDP" but it says it "Got 3 tracker ips" along with 2 relay IPs. [2013-12-27 20:28:36.527] Got 2 relay ips[2013-12-27 20:28:36.527] ip 67.215.231.242:3000[2013-12-27 20:28:36.527] ip 67.215.229.106:3000[2013-12-27 20:28:36.527] Got 3 tracker ips[2013-12-27 20:28:36.527] ip 54.225.100.8:3000[2013-12-27 20:28:36.527] ip 54.225.196.38:3000[2013-12-27 20:28:36.527] ip 54.225.92.50:3000 Any idea why it is not using one of the three