SyncApp on a Synology DS1010+ (v. 1.0.75)


PeterVerhees

Recommended Posts

I've mentioned this before. Does anyone have the same problem as me?

When using a Synology NAS (DS1010+ or the DS508) with the latest DSM 4.2 Beta but also the previous DSM 4.1 on the DS1010+ (i386) AND the DSM 4.0 which is running on the DS508 (ppc) (cannot upgrade to newer version) I get this.


./SyncApp_i386-1.0.75: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.4' not found (required by ./SyncApp_i386-1.0.75)

I get this with 1.0.75, 1.0.63 and 1.0.62. I cannot upgrade my Glibc to a 2.4 variant. The information on the libc.so.6 is:


GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6, by Roland McGrath et al.
Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Compiled by GNU CC version 3.3.6.
Compiled on a Linux 2.6.12 system on 2009-11-27.
Available extensions:
GNU libio by Per Bothner
crypt add-on version 2.1 by Michael Glad and others
linuxthreads-0.10 by Xavier Leroy
BIND-8.2.3-T5B
libthread_db work sponsored by Alpha Processor Inc
NIS(YP)/NIS+ NSS modules 0.19 by Thorsten Kukuk
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/bugs.html>.

Someone out there must also have this problem. I believe on newer nasses of Synology there must be a newer version of glibc installed. Can someone please verify this? Enter this on your commandline:


/lib/libc.so.6

and post the output.

Can someone build me a version for 2.3 glibc to test on my nasses? Or build me a static linked version. I might think that when the SyncApp gets released, lots of people want to run this on their older nas too.

Edited by PeterVerhees
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Update:

I managed to start the application after using http://www.magicermine.com/ to create a independent file to run. However this sucks for many reasons. Least of all a 30 day trail. ;-)

Statifier also created a usable independent file, however, this would only run after I turned VDSO (Virtual Dynamic Shared Object) and stack randomization off on my Synology. Which I rather not do for obvious reasons. (see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Address_space_layout_randomization)

This is all with the i386 binairy, I have not even started on the PowerPC one and do no even know if this is possible.

The aplha testing is quite the challenge it seems, having fun over here. ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.