jaykay
-
Posts
9 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by jaykay
-
-
hi,
on my desktop btsync says "1.3GB in 1067 files". on a second machine with read-only-access it says "1.0 GB in 1023 files". Additionally, files i delete on the Desktop are not deleted in the read-only folder.
I create those folder by initially copying it with external hard drives between my machines, as the network is quite slow. i already tried removing and re-adding the folder to btsync on both machines.
Logs are not helpful here, although recently i get some of these:
[date] Download using patch (diff:0) path/to/file/IMGP1903.JPG
[date] [OnNotifyFileChange] /mnt/usbhdd/path/to/file/IMGP1903.JPG
[date] Finished downloading file path/to/file/IMGP1903.JPG, writing file attributes mt:1281548390
[date] [OnNotifyFileChange] /mnt/usbhdd/path/to/file/IMGP1903.JPG
[date] Torrent magnet (<some hash>) status:137 error:<NULL> meta:0 conns:1 io:0
[date] Torrent IMGP1903.JPG status:137 error:<NULL> meta:1 conns:0 io:0
[date] Force unloading torrent IMGP1903.JPG
although i can't find any that seem connected to the incomplete folder.
btsync versions are newest.
any ideas?
-
hi,
i have btsync running on an raspberry pi and the sync.log grew until there was no space left on the sd card, by then it reached 12GB.
is this a bug or the usual behaviour for logfiles and i need to logrotate?
thanks,
jaykay
-
today i learned you need to search for "nested" sync folders to find some discussions about 3.
tl;dr: not possible with btsync right now, but support probably gets added at some time or another.
under windows moving the nested folder somewhere else and creating a link inside the old folder should work fine, as long as you don't need paths like \parentDirectory\link\someSubdirectory to work. othwise you could create symlinks, but i do not know how btsync handles these.
-
@greatMarko: i thought about how to search for this, but "nested" didn't cross my mind, thanks.
@joebush: don't ask why i didn't try it out with some test dir...
@Shot2: thats what i thought, i didn't see any reason why it shouldn't work.
thanks guys!
-
why shouldnt it be possible?
generate secrets for /data/readdir/, and start syncing with the read-only secret.
then generate secrets for /data/readdir/writedir/, and add this folder on all machines with the full access secret.
expected behaviour:
peer writes to readdir: nothing happens.
peer writes to readdir/writedir: the change gets synced.
main machine writes anywhere: the change gets synced.
can bittorrent sync handle this?
edit: does it change anything if i said /data/readdir/ from my main machine gets synced to other devices as usual, but /data/readdir/writedir gets synced to another location on those other devices, not into a subfolder of the original sync dir?
-
as i said, for me it *just works*, without dyndns or any port settings.
and everyone who has the secrets has access, noone else.
-
in my case, i have an RPi behind a router with a dynamic ip.
and it just works, even without setting a listening port and port forwarding. i don't know why, but hey, it works. i guess this is the magic of the bittorrent-protocol
when you need other services to access your RPi from outside you LAN, google "dyndns".
-
i have a large folder, which is backupped by two devices with read access.
one subfolder should be synced with the same machines with read/write access, as i want to use it like a dropbox.
how to set this up is clear, but my question is whether bittorrent sync will handle this correctly, as in not trying to write a new file two times, as it is in two sync folders
regards,
jaykay
read-only-folder not updating completely, torrent errors
in Sync General Discussion
Posted
thanks nils. i diffed the contents of both folders, and the read-only does contain everything (except syncignored files) plus undeleted folders.
so theres nothing missing, the numbers in the UI are wrong. and folders do not get deleted. i wrote an email regarding both to the team.