florentm
-
Posts
31 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by florentm
-
-
The curious stuff is that previouslw it was working with proxifer/proxycap but it seems it's no longer the case.
I will investigate this...
-
I already tested that by "preloading" 1tb of files with a USB drive for the first transfer it's working fine.
You just need to wait that all the file are checked by btsync
-
Encrypted peers directly in the client great!
-
Hello,
Even if you use Read only secret Btsync needs to write in the directory, it's required for the sync database
-
I would resume it to
you have to send 3gb to WesMBA (Upload)
and you have to download 27.6gb from Jeff
upload 17.9mb to office and 1.7gb to coredozen
-
A predifined host using the external IP ?
Not sure it will work if there is a NAT
-
We can't do that sorry, just be patient
-
Hello,The Beta version of www.btsync.com has now come to an end.We are delighted to inform you the new version has been deployed!We are now offering unlimited storage from only 8€/month!Go to https://www.btsync.com and type "10PERCENT" in the voucher field to get a 10% discount on any plan.Best regards,The BTSync Team
-
Hello,
The Beta is now finished, the new version has been deployed.
We are now offering ulimited storage from as low as 8€/month !
You can use the coupon "10PERCENT" for a 10% discount on any plan
Best regards,
-
did you also tried https://www.btsync.com ? The site is hosted on heroku and their SSL address are not always blocked in China
-
Hello,
Pricing have been revised! -50%
HTTPS is now available to transmit your encrypted secret !
Use voucher BETABT for 1month and 250gb Free
-
Hello,
Pricing have been revised! -50%
HTTPS is now available to transmit your encrypted secret !
Use voucher BETABT for 1month and 250gb Free
-
Hello everyone,
After a lot of work http://www.btsync.com now allows you to enter your own secrets! you can now use encrypted secrets!
Pricing will be revised soon!
You can still use BETABT voucher for one free month
-
Hello everyone,
After a lot of work http://www.btsync.com now allows you to enter your own secrets! you can now use encrypted secrets!
Pricing will be revised soon!
You can still use BETABT voucher for one free month
-
If I give you an encrypted secret I will have the master secret thus it's pointless from a privacy point of vue.
We need to wait that the client can generate an encrypted secret...
You can still use Boxcryptor or PGP to encrypt the file in the directory you are syncing
-
Hello,
Thanks for the feedback
Multiple secret per plan is planned.
For encrypted as I said we must wait a public release allowing it, I can generate them because I have an API key but If I generate it for you it useless from a privacy perspective.
-
Signed up and uploading!
In your terms of service you are somewhat restrictive about sharing keys (only for personal and family use). Would a teacher sharing audiovisual materials (<10 GB, not copyrighted) with their students (<100) be allowed or considered abuse? Or simple would the connection be throttled down? (Yes, I know, the school should provide a similar service, but they do not nor will be providing in the forseable future.)
Hello,
Thank you for your feedback, indeed it's a bit restrictive to stay on the safe side.
If it's not copyrighted I have nothing against using the service for educational purpose!
It's a good use case, don't hesitate to give a feedback on the performance of the service.
Thx
EDIT:
I saw your post in the other topic, I am very interested in your feedback. Don't hesistate to contact me directly if needed
-
Are you planning on supporting encrypted shares?
Yes we are planning it
it's even already in the FAQIt need to be more tested before on the client side and be accessible without an API key for lambda user.
on our side we need also to implement a way for user to gave us a secret because if we generate an encrypted secret we also have the master and then it's does not help privacy...
-
That worked for me.
Are you planning on supporting encrypted shares?
Perfect thx! Enjoy your storage space
-
thx a lot for the feedback, I was able to reproduce the issue when you enter a coupon first without any plan selected. you can reset it by refreshing the page.
We will investigate it
Already more than 5gb uploaded
-
Hi.
Just signed up, first comment is that the validation link is missing in the email, the http:// in the address and therefore at least my email client isn't making it clickable. Might be a hurdle for others.
During the shopping cart/plan selection phase I am getting an error with the code and it doesn't work. The red wide bar that I assume would contain the error test is blank.
For reference:
Thank you for the feedback
For the mail we will modify it to make it clickable in any client
Your order was not successfull because you need to redeem the coupon by clicking on the box next to the coupon entry box.
Florent
-
Hello everyone,
My company is launching a BitTorrent Sync cloud storage solution! It will be targeted to large volume of data.
I am looking for 100 Beta Users ! I am offering 250gb for 1 month.
How to participate:
1) Go to www.btsync.com2) Register
3) Confirm your Email
4) Log in and select the basic plan 250gb - 1 month
5) Use the voucher BETABT
6) Enjoy! and upload tons of data
All feedback welcome here or to contact@btsync.com
Thank you!
-
Hello everyone,
My company is launching a BitTorrent Sync cloud storage solution! It will be targeted to large volume of data.
I am looking for 100 Beta Users ! I am offering 250gb for 1 month.
How to participate:
1) Go to www.btsync.com2) Register
3) Confirm your Email
4) Log in and select the basic plan 250gb - 1 month
5) Use the voucher BETABT
6) Enjoy! and upload tons of data
All feedback welcome here (I will create a dedicated topic - HERE) or to contact@btsync.com
Thank you!
-
Hello,
I found a bug who is a bit annoying
I have 100 config for 100 users
simply
user1
user2
.
.
.
user10
.
.
.
user100
The issue is that the duplicate instance check a startup is matching user100 with user10 or user1 (longer config file name seems to be launched first)
I suppose the starting script is doing a "contains" instead of a "equal"
If you can have a look
Thx!
EDIT:
problem is here
if [ $(ls -l ${CONFIG_DIR}/${BASENAME}*.${CONFIG_EXT} 2> /dev/null | wc -l) -gt 1 ]; thenlog_error_msg "Duplicate instance name $BASENAME found. Interrupting sequence."exit 1fi
it's even already in the FAQ
Api In 1.4
in Developers
Posted
Hello,
Is there any new features / documentation planned for the 1.4 ?
Thank you