I have been using BitSync since the first beta. I loved it. But this new upgrade extortion is bad for business. I would be willing to pay once for a sofware product, or pay annually for hosted storage with a certain number of Gigabytes. But there is no way in hell I am going to pay $100 a year just to have BitSync.
There was a great hosting service called BtSync that I was using for my backup with BitTorrent sync. But when the plans of 2.0 and 3.0 came out they refunded my money and shut it down.
Long story short - BitTorrent Labs needs to poll their customers as to WHAT we are willing to pay for. I would pay for BitSync with offshore hosted storage OUTSIDE AMERICA. I will not pay a subscription just for BitSync itself, as much as I loved it before you guys BROKE it.
I Was In Support Of Sync 2.0, Right Up Till They Broke A Promise
in Sync General Discussion
Posted · Edited by kengriffith
I have been using BitSync since the first beta. I loved it. But this new upgrade extortion is bad for business. I would be willing to pay once for a sofware product, or pay annually for hosted storage with a certain number of Gigabytes. But there is no way in hell I am going to pay $100 a year just to have BitSync.
There was a great hosting service called BtSync that I was using for my backup with BitTorrent sync. But when the plans of 2.0 and 3.0 came out they refunded my money and shut it down.
Long story short - BitTorrent Labs needs to poll their customers as to WHAT we are willing to pay for. I would pay for BitSync with offshore hosted storage OUTSIDE AMERICA. I will not pay a subscription just for BitSync itself, as much as I loved it before you guys BROKE it.
Time to find a new sync product.
(((