nonik

Members
  • Posts

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by nonik

  1. Oh, missed that when I skimmed the forum. That sure seems like what I was looking for, thanks! Now to play the waiting game...
  2. First of all, great progress so far on SyncApp--I am looking forward to the future progress of it! My question/feature request is essentially enabling a set of synced folders to use the master/slave paradigm. That is, given one master directory and any number of slave directories, they satisfy the following criteria: - the master directory is never written to, only read from (by the SyncApp) - all changes (by a user) to the master directory are synced to all slave directories - changes to any of the slave directories are reverted, and updated to be in sync with the master directory Essentially, I want a directory replicator without worrying about accidental/incidental changes in the slave folders from being synced back to the authoritative master directory--which I never want to be written to by SyncApp. I've never seen this feature in any other file syncing apps (are there?), and would be highly desirable for a variety of purposes. I've thought about workaround solutions to this problem involving file permissions/ACLs, but that seems like it would cause issues with SyncApp amongst other things, and it would be nice for a feature like this to be baked into the product. Thoughts?