Jim_Lafleur

Members
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Jim_Lafleur

  1. On 3/16/2017 at 2:58 AM, RomanZ said:

    Jim,

    From technical POV both NASes can manage the amount of files with 8 gigs of RAM. It's harder to say about CPU power as it just affects the speed of initial indexing, consequent indices and transfer latency. It's hard to say if that is enough without knowing your demands to the whole system performance and without direct testing.

    OK. Can you give me examples of CPUs which worked well for 1M files in the past?

  2. Hi Romanz,

    Thanks for the answer.

    We have 2TB. This include 140k folders and 650k files. 

    Would the DS716+II be a model with enough juice? It has a Celeron N3160 processor (Passmark:1665; Quad Core 1.6Ghz with burst up to 2.24 GHz) with possibility (hacked) of 8GB of RAM.

    If not, would the DS1515+ do the job? It has a Celeron C2538 processor (Quad Core 2.4 GHz) with possibility (hacked) of 16GB of RAM.

    If not I think, price wise, we should maybe go the freenas way (or rockstor if Resilio is supported on it)?

  3. Hi,

    I need to sync 2TB of data between a Synology with DSM 6.1 at the main office and one PC at a branch office. We need the user at branch office to be able to access and modify the files. The modified files would then sync to Main office and the users there could access it and modify it also. I've thought about using Resilio in order to achieve this.

    The shared folder is 2TB. Would that be too big for Resilio ? Would it make the Synology's CPU work too hard too often?

    Does it take long before modifications goes back and forth?

    They don't have the Synology yet, but I like Synology and I'm scanning the possibilities.