deamon

Members
  • Posts

    7
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by deamon

  1. Hi all

    Since a while i struggle with incomplete transfers in read-only folders. I searched a lot on the forums, found similar things but no answer (which worked). Could you please help me with that?

     

    Setup:

    "Origin": OSX, BTSync 1.2.82

    "Backup": Debian ARM, BTsync 1.2.82, API enabled. Initial Sync in LAN, now connection over WAN

    Files: 107GB in 40k Files (mostly pictures)

     

    Problem:

    One file never got synced, the Client on the Mac always had this "arrow UP" and 3.4MB. New files were synced successfully. File was not locked nor write-protected. Debug log on Backup showed:

    [20140303 09:03:10.205] SyncFilesController: Update for invalidated file "1402_Blah/xxx.JPG" (R/O). Skipping

    Now i thought let's recreate all indexes. I deleted .sync and all .Sync* files in my share. It took a night to index / sync, now i've got 400MB out of sync.

     

    I love btsync, i'd like to kick out Dropbox, but with this feature not working properly, i can't really rely on it.

     

    Thanks for reading and your help!!

  2. "check_for_update" is nothing to do with deleted/altered files - its a flag to denote whether Sync should check for newer versions of the software i.e. itself!

     

    Thank you, that makes sense!  :)

     

    Is there a way to prevent BTSync from recreate deleted / altered files on a readonly-node?

     

    Thanks

    Chris

  3. Hi there
    I am suffering the same Problem described in the forum here and here. What i noticed is that sync often completes after i re-create the index. Means: Stop-service, delete .sync/*, start service.

     

    I am using sync to backup my pictures, it's a folder of 105GB or about 25k Files. The Index-File uses about 100mb of space. There are posts in the topics above speaking about "Check if you have file-locks", but this isn't the problem. Sync does work with newly added files (it says 300MB first, and stucks at 20MB again, just the same as before the upload.

     

    Is there a reason - beside the time it take - against a scheduled recreation of the index file once a week (or so)? Or do you have any ideas to find away avoiding this?

     

    Chris