Borph
-
Posts
29 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Borph
-
-
It was clearly after upgrade. The ID was 20 bytes, I disconnected, deleted .sync, and connected again and it seems to be fine!
Any idea about the "More Options"?
-
After installing Synology package 2.2.5 some of my shared folders seem to have an error, see screenshot (column is 'status').
The folder exists, and the access rights seem to be right, also for the .sync folder. Any idea?
Another issue (minor ATM): under "Preferences -> Advanced -> More Options" it opens just the warning message, but in previous version there was a number of options to change. Seems to be wrong purely in UI.
-
@RomanZ, finally thanks! Will give it a shot!
-
Any ETA on the NAS builds? http://help.getsync.com/customer/portal/articles/1888507-synology
-
@RomanZ: I know that page and it's fine for me. What I meant is can you ping me when the 2.2.2 build is available there (currently 2.2.1).
-
@RomanZ, can you please notify when NAS builds are available of this?
-
@kos13: I would implement it in the GUI, but as first step even easier, in a file like the IgnoreList, say 'WhiteList'?
Imagine you have a number of subfolders in your synced folder, e.g. I have a folder with photos:
photos
-2013
-2014
-2015
And on one device you just have the file 'WhiteList' in 'photos/.sync' configured with
2015
and it would just sync that subfolder of it.
-
This is quite an internet focused company, selling a virtual good. Bitcoin is Internet money. Why not accepting Bitcoin for payment for the pro license? Using a payment processor its easy, and it would enable to sell and ship licenses to every corner of the world, even to countries which don't like e.g. Paypal.
-
+1 for a selective sync under Linux.
The ".bts" syncing on demand is not the selective sync of Dropbox!
-
Copying the content of the license file did the trick, thank you!!
BTW, on the console there was no output at all using that argument. Btsync was stopped at that time.
-
I purchased the 2.2 license, and the email says
"On Linux, copy the link, and click the “Manual Connection” button in the web UI to paste it."
I did that, but it says "invalid link". My guess is that the link has spaces and other characters, which get converted while pasting into %2B and %3D and such.
Anyway, how am I supposed to convert such link?
Ehm, I don't have even the way to add it on command line:
btsync --license Sync_Pro_Purchase.btskey
was without effect.
-
A: Non-subscription Sync Pro licenses include all product updates within a given product version.
Upgrade releases contain functional enhancements and must be purchased separately unless you have an active subscription license.
"product version" == major version number I hope, as it was said before it covers 2.x releases.
Well, they are always free to increase the major number for rather minor improvements if they want to introduce a new licence of course..
-
Me too! Bittorrent Sync is a network program but doesn't even have IPv6??
I thought it's because of the DHT, but they seem to ditch it anyway.
-
Will there be a version for NAS devices? Synology builds are still on 2.1.3, stopping me from purchasing.
-
I edited /etc/init.d/btsync according to noiime, but no luck first. With some debugging I found out that the option "--log sync.log" or so caused the process to die (access rights?). At least removing helped.
-
Since the PPA seems to be abandoned indeed, maybe I should post my nice systemd multi-user BTSync configuration
.Also had issues, but somehow I can start only directly now, not anymore via "sudo service btsync" :-( Would you mind posting your configuration?
-
No, better name it "on demand" or so, because "selective sync" refers already to something else, not only in Bittorrent Sync.
-
After several attempts it seems to work with a Socks5 proxy configured while in "standalone" mode.
-
I successfully linked nodes at home, but I would like to link my work PC, too. The firewall seems to prevent this.
There is a proxy setting when I set it up as "first node", but it doesn't seem to respect this during linking process.
-
box:$ dpkg -l btsyncGewünscht=Unbekannt/Installieren/R=Entfernen/P=Vollständig Löschen/Halten| Status=Nicht/Installiert/Config/U=Entpackt/halb konFiguriert/ Halb installiert/Trigger erWartet/Trigger anhängig|/ Fehler?=(kein)/R=Neuinstallation notwendig (Status, Fehler: GROSS=schlecht)||/ Name Version Architektur Beschreibung+++-==================-==============-==============-==========================================ii btsync 1.4.1-1 all Private network P2P file synchronisation d
I added the PPA and ran sudo apg-get install...that's all.
Just ran an apt-get update & upgrade, it seems to update to 2.0, sorry for inconvenience.
-
Hi,
I think about installing 2.0 on Ubuntu/Linux and wonder about the new features, not all Linux related.
- How does the "on demand" (placeholder) sync feature work? Under Windows there are the .bts files.
- How can files which are downloaded "on demand" be removed again to return to the placeholders? "rm -rf"?
- Is there "selective sync"? I don't mean the "on demand download", rather excluding/including subfolders via the API *.
- Is there any API for 2.0 at all?
- Is there a way to created encrypted 2.0 folders for untrusted peers?
*http://help.getsync.com/customer/portal/articles/1588607-sync-api-command-reference
-
didn't help. I noticed that there are two btsyncs:
I hacked /etc/init.d/btsync, that did the trick.
-
I just installed it where it wasn't installed before with
apt-get install btsync
But the web-ui shows me 1.4.111!
dpkg-reconfigure btsync
didn't help. I noticed that there are two btsyncs:
box:~$ /usr/lib/btsync/btsync-daemon --helpBitTorrent Sync 1.4.111box:~$ /usr/lib/btsync-core/btsync-core --helpBitTorrent Sync 2.0.85
How to tell that the latter should be automatically started?
-
@tuxpoldo, do you know when you have time to update the PPA to the 2.0 version? Thanks for your good work btw!
.
Nas Build 2.2.5: Cannot Identify The Destination Folder
in Sync Troubleshooting
Posted
@Moe, yes that is exactly what I did. I took care when adding that the path in the last dialog is correct.