hawkman

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    31

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by hawkman

  2. Recurring errors

    in Sync Troubleshooting

    Posted

    In the log files, I'm getting these recurring errors. Any suggestions on how to stop them occurring? 

    [20160714 13:24:10.715] MC[EDBF] [33C4]: failed to verify signature of remote file .TemporaryItems/folders.501, aborting

    [20160714 13:24:10.715] assert failed /mnt/jenkins/workspace/Build-Sync-PPC/SyncFolderMergeController.cpp:842

  8. "cannot get the list of trackers"

    in Sync Troubleshooting

    Posted

    I've been using BitTorrent sync for several years, mostly without significant problems. However one of my peers now reports "No tracker connection available. Cannot get the list of trackers" and shows zero peers connected even though all my other peers can see each other. Sync is not happening as a result.

    There are a few tracker-related messages in the logs but they seem fairly benign. The only thing I can think of is that my local IP is 192.168.5.11 which is obviously not public - but I haven't changed anything so that seems unlikely.

    Any ideas what's going on?

    [20160301 08:22:35.287] TRACKER[5496] requesting peers from 52.0.102.230:3000 - la: 192.168.5.11:22222

    [20160301 08:22:35.287] Creating TCP tracker connection to 52.0.102.230:3000

    [20160301 08:22:35.287] Creating uTP tracker connection to 52.0.102.230:3000

    [20160301 08:22:35.288] TRACKER[3093] requesting peers from 52.0.102.230:3000 - la: 192.168.5.11:22222

    [20160301 08:22:35.288] Using existent TCP tracker connection to 52.0.102.230:3000

    [20160301 08:22:35.288] Using existent uTP tracker connection to 52.0.102.230:3000

    [20160301 08:22:35.288] TRACKER[CB10] requesting peers from 52.0.102.230:3000 - la: 192.168.5.11:22222

    [20160301 08:22:35.288] Using existent TCP tracker connection to 52.0.102.230:3000

    [20160301 08:22:35.288] Using existent uTP tracker connection to 52.0.102.230:3000

    [20160301 08:22:35.288] TRACKER[33F6] requesting peers from 52.0.102.230:3000 - la: 192.168.5.11:22222

    [20160301 08:22:35.288] Using existent TCP tracker connection to 52.0.102.230:3000

    [20160301 08:22:35.288] Using existent uTP tracker connection to 52.0.102.230:3000

  10. "out Of Sync" + Permission Denied

    in Sync Troubleshooting

    Posted

    Everything on the WD MyBook Live runs as root, so I don't think that's the problem... unless root could somehow not have access? The permissions (above) seem to indicate that it does.

     

      PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND                                                            

     1656 root      20   0 87680  19m 6272 S 88.4  7.7 730:05.10 btsync

  11. "out Of Sync" + Permission Denied

    in Sync Troubleshooting

    Posted

    I am running the latest btsync on a WD MyBook Live. I have a directory of about 1000 files which I have set up as a read-only peer to two other read/write peers. It isn't working since the latest upgrade. I was getting a message on the UI saying "out of sync" but it wasn't syncing, so I deleted the share and recreated it with the read-only key.

     

    Now that it is very slowly indexing, I'm still getting "out of sync" and if I look at the log file, I see the following messages for each file as it appears to be indexing them. Can someone help me understand what's wrong here? 

     

    [20141209 08:46:43.276] Error: /DataVolume/shares/Public/<filename> - PostDownload: Permission denied

    [20141209 08:47:43.235] TorrentFile: unloading torrent by timeout

     

    The permissions on the files are:

     

    -rw-rw-rw- 1 nobody share <filesize> Apr 19  2007 /DataVolume/shares/Public/<filename>

     

    Thanks!

  13. New Sync Installation On Wd Mycloud Mirror

    in Sync Troubleshooting

    Posted

    I've just installed Sync on a WD MyCloud Mirror and I can't seem to get the UI to work. The application starts fine on the command line - both in daemon mode and in "no daemon" mode - but when I go to http://<my IP>:8888 I get nothing.

     

    As I understand it, there were some issues with this drive's FW, resulting in "Killed" being the output of starting it. I haven't seen that personally but I've tried downgrading the firmware from 1.04.xx to 1.03.xx and also to 1.02.xx with no change: same result, the app starts fine and the web UI does not work.

     

    Any advice?

  14. Rebuild Required For Wd Mycloud Fw 4

    in Sync for NAS (Network Attached Storage)

    Posted

    Hi, I've tried running it on the latest FW and it does indeed execute but I can't access the port at 8888...

     

     

    /usr/local/bin # ulimit -c unlimited

    /usr/local/bin # ./btsync --nodaemon

    By using this application, you agree to our Privacy Policy, Terms of Use and End User License Agreement.

    http://www.bittorrent.com/legal/privacy

    http://www.bittorrent.com/legal/terms-of-use

    http://www.bittorrent.com/legal/eula

     

    [20141017 11:16:54.523] total physical memory -1 max disk cache 2097152

    [20141017 11:16:54.525] Using IP address 192.168.5.140

    [20141017 11:16:54.529] Loading config file version 1.4.93

    [20141017 11:16:55.575] UPnP: Device error "http://192.168.5.140:49153/nasdevicedesc.xml": (-2) 

    [20141017 11:16:55.615] UPnP: ERROR mapping TCP port 15101 -> 192.168.5.140:15101. Deleting mapping and trying again: (501) Action Failed

    [20141017 11:16:55.622] UPnP: ERROR removing TCP port 15101: (714) The specified value does not exist in the array

    [20141017 11:16:55.634] UPnP: ERROR mapping TCP port 15101 -> 192.168.5.140:15101: (501) Action Failed

    [20141017 11:16:55.639] UPnP: Device error "http://192.168.5.142:80/description.xml": (-2) 

    [20141017 11:16:55.683] UPnP: Device error "http://192.168.5.137:1400/xml/device_description.xml": (-2) 

    [20141017 11:16:55.747] UPnP: Device error "http://192.168.5.148:1400/xml/device_description.xml": (-2) 

    [20141017 11:16:55.768] UPnP: Device error "http://192.168.5.139:1400/xml/device_description.xml": (-2) 

    [20141017 11:16:55.854] UPnP: Device error "http://192.168.5.108:1400/xml/device_description.xml": (-2) 

    [20141017 11:16:55.874] UPnP: Device error "http://192.168.5.113:1400/xml/device_description.xml": (-2) 

    [20141017 11:16:55.874] UPnP: Device error "http://192.168.5.120:1400/xml/device_description.xml": (-2) 

    [20141017 11:16:56.012] UPnP: Device error "http://192.168.5.126:1400/xml/device_description.xml": (-2) 

    [20141017 11:16:56.585] UPnP: Device error "http://192.168.5.10:1164/DeviceDescription.xml": (-2) 

    [20141017 11:16:57.591] UPnP: Device error "http://192.168.5.20:1900/cameradesc.xml": (-2)

  15. Two Peers Working, One Peer Not Working

    in Sync Troubleshooting

    Posted

    I have three peers using several shared folders. Two of them are communicating properly and one is not.

     

    The one that isn't is showing this in the logs, over and over again. What's going on here?

     

    [20140224 04:54:58.330] Sending broadcast ping for share <long string of hex>

    [20140224 04:54:58.331] Sending broadcast ping for share <long string of hex>

    [20140224 04:54:58.331] Sending broadcast ping for share <long string of hex>

    [20140224 04:54:59.334] Sending broadcast ping for share <long string of hex>

    [20140224 04:54:59.334] Sending broadcast ping for share <long string of hex>

    [20140224 04:54:59.334] Sending broadcast ping for share <long string of hex>

    [20140224 04:54:59.334] Sending broadcast ping for share <long string of hex>

    [20140224 04:54:59.334] Sending broadcast ping for share <long string of hex>

    [20140224 04:54:59.334] Sending broadcast ping for share <long string of hex>

    [20140224 04:54:59.334] Sending broadcast ping for share <long string of hex>

    [20140224 04:54:59.334] Sending broadcast ping for share <long string of hex>

    [20140224 04:54:59.335] Sending broadcast ping for share <long string of hex>

    [20140224 04:54:59.335] Sending broadcast ping for share <long string of hex>

    [20140224 04:54:59.412] Got 2 relay ips

    [20140224 04:54:59.412] ip 67.215.229.106:3000

    [20140224 04:54:59.412] ip 67.215.231.242:3000

    [20140224 04:54:59.488] Got 3 tracker ips

    [20140224 04:54:59.488] ip 54.225.92.50:3000

    [20140224 04:54:59.488] ip 54.225.196.38:3000

    [20140224 04:54:59.488] ip 54.225.100.8:3000

     

  16. Feature Request: Scheduling

    in Sync General Discussion

    Posted

    Could we have a scheduling feature added which sets upload/download speed limits during different times of the day?

     

    It would be very helpful to have synchronizations happen overnight instead of using bandwidth during the day. Also some people in the UK have unlimited nights and weekends but are capped during the day, especially with BT's new FTTC service.

     

    Thanks in advance!

  19. Mips Support

    in Feature Requests

    Posted

    That's reasonable. What is it about the MIPS architecture that makes it so challenging? I'm not an expert - I'm a "plop into compiler" kind of guy.

    Also, I am curious what the endgame for this project is. How do you expect to turn this project into a business? It's great and we love it, but as users of Google Reader are painfully aware, that doesn't make it live forever...

  21. Mips Support

    in Feature Requests

    Posted

    Um, thanks for stating the obvious? I mean, we're obviously pleased that someone is going to rebuild it for MIPS but that's not really an answer. How about a bit of actual news - this year, next year, etc?

    The problem that all of us face is that we know that building for another architecture isn't really that difficult for most well-designed code. Hence the frustration.

    Is there something about this code that makes it more difficult, and if so, can you educate us on this to help us understand the delay?

    Again, I'm convinced that this project would be better served as open source. I don't see how Bittorrent, Inc can make money from this project. If you're not prepared to answer the architecture question, could you answer the business model one?