jmpr

Members
  • Posts

    28
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jmpr

  1. I have just downloaded 2.6.0 por my QNAP and a Windows laptop, with no issues (at this moment). Everything went ok. Same peers, and some improvements (a 50 gb VirtualBox file that always caused problems has been synced ok).

    I will keep an eye on it and report any related problem.

  2. 4 hours ago, BensTech said:

    The version of Resilio which was experiencing this issue was Windows 2.5.7 64 bit edition. There's no way I'm upgrading ANY of my systems (Windows, Mac, QNAP) which running well under 2.4.x to 2.5.x until Resilio documents it's fixed in their future release notes and folks stop reporting problems in the forums. These forums are more valuable than support, which is sad.

    2.5.7 has solved these issues for me. I have it running in Windows 10 Pro 64 bit and QNAP NAS.

  3. 18 minutes ago, BensTech said:

    I had the same issue and opened a ticket with support and they weren't helpful (that's being nice, they literally wasted my time and told me in the end this, is normal that the connections keep going off-line on a "busy server". Over 5 days of outages). In the end, I decided to downgrade to 2.4.5 (I strongly recommend you save all your versions and # them) and peers returned and syncing is working. Overall, it appears the newer versions are having more and more issues. I don't upgrade unless there is a specific issue now. I'm very pissed at support.

     

     

    Look at this:

    With 2.5.7 in my NAS the problem has been solved. But the version in app center is older. Just download the new directly form qnap and install it. It goes ok.

     

     

  4. 44 minutes ago, Helen said:

    what is rastreator? 
    it's safe to use relay, though speed of syncing will be slower than that when peers are connected directly. 

    In Spanish "Rastreador" is just below "use relay" in folder preferences. I don't know the name in English Sync.

  5. I's happening again, and there has been no change in any server (no upgrades). Only folders that use "rastreator" are connected. I need predefined hosts to be running.

    I do not like to use rastreator or relay, as some of my content are private data from customers of the company. Is it safe and private to use relay and rastreator?

  6. 19 hours ago, Helen said:

    Looks like the problem is ssl tunnel. You can either update all peers to v2.5., or leave them for a while so that the reconnect, as @mr.canada notices, it takes a while to establish the tunnel. The fix is being worked on and will be released asap.

    Today it is the same. No peers for those folders. Some of the other peers can't be updated by me (and some are in Qnap nas that has not been updated yet).

  7. On 16/5/2017 at 10:30 PM, ekim501 said:

    Just an update to this - I have no peers when it's setup to use only "predefined hosts" and "search LAN".  Even if the computers are on the same network they can't find each other.  As soon as I turn on "Use Tracker Server" then they can see each other.  I'm only having this issue with the one computer that is running 2.5.0 and my android phone after the update.

    I have exactly the same problem. All peers that use "predefined hosts" (in LAN or WAN) are gone. I do not like to use tracker or relay.

     

  8. My Resilio is now running ok in my Qnap nas, but there is something strange that happened before migration, and I hope to be solved with new version. In my laptop, the Resilio app sees the nas duplicated. If there is only 1 peer (the nas) the app shows 2 peers, the nas (with its name) twice. Sometimes it says "peers 1 of 2" and one of them is offline, and sometimes, they both are online. And act as different peers, the number of pending upload files is different, and one of them syncs before the other (not always the same one).

    I do no use dht nor relay, only predefined hosts. Is it possible that someway somebody has stolen my id or something and has cloned my nas and is receiving my files? What can I do?