kamborio

Members
  • Posts

    41
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by kamborio

  1. No is not... updates are being offered to 111 via autoupdate!
  2. Do the free version and pro version work together? So for example,if I have the pro version can I share a folder with someone that is using the free version?
  3. Nope, this has been happening for months. It is possible that the first sync never happened as you mention (can't remember) but by now it should be aware no more full indexing is needed and still, if I close the app and I open it again, it starts a full index again.
  4. I do not mind that kind of reindexing. I mean that app starts, the folder shows 0 in size, and starts scanning all the files again. The history even says "new file added". Mine does that all the time, I have 15 folders and 5 or 6 of them do a full reindex everytime they are started... The other folders show X GB, those 5 or 6 show 0GB and you can see the number growing until it stops at the right size...
  5. I am generating the log (as in enable debug mode and restart the app). However... It is reindexing... I have seen this on a few computers, there are certain folders that go trhough a full reindex everytime you start the app... Annoying.
  6. I have a folder (136GB, almost 1 million files) that doesn't want to sync. The log shows the following error: SyncTcpReq: Unable to uncompress incoming data, err = -5 There is heavy traficc between the two hosts (5 to 20 Mbps) but the folder remains out of sync. So far only 18.83GB have been synced. Using 1.4.110 on Windows 2012 R2. Regards, David
  7. Too many clicks. And if you have a lot of folders syncing you have to click so many times! I was happier with the previous way of having everything in a tab, although this way helps identify the file and the folder.
  8. Well said... I only updated one virtual machine for testing purposes and I am so glad I did that. Why on earth have they changed the UI when the core still not working? Good developed software should have the backend and the UI very well separated, why can't we use 1.4 with the old UI as a fallback?
  9. "Listening port" does not work (big disappointment). "Limit receiving/sending rate" seems to be working now (at least it accepts the values, haven't tested whether it applies them.
  10. Number 8. You can see how fast each folder is uploading / downloading but the global "spedometer" that was at the bottom is gone...
  11. New simplified UI UI was fully revised and now looks similar on all platforms. Also, UI was simplified significantly to make Sync usage faster, more understandable and convenient.HAHAHA! As we say in England... Bollocks! The UI is a catastrophe! Oh yes, fades in, fades out, very nice, but usability... ZERO. 1. The tab I was using the most was "Devices". Now If I want to quickly check what peers are connected, I have to click "x of n Peers" on every folder. I was hoping that in the future you would update the "My Sync" and "Devices" tab into one in a tree like UI but no, you've gone backwards. 2. Android devices appear all of them with my username, I do not know which device is which anymore. 3. Can't resize columns. I can find the "hidden" separator but when I move left/right goes funny. 4. When changing the preferences for each folder there is no "Cancel". As soon as you make the changes boom they are done. 5. Still NO SORTING column! 6. History doesn't seem to update in real time (you have to close and open the history) 7. I feel the UI is too big. I like a lot of things on my screen. That's just for starters after 10 minutes of using it. It would've been better if you fixed the old UI instead of making a new one that doesn't work. Really nice software but the UI has always been lacking and I think you have gone 2 steps backwards in that department. Regards, David Perez
  12. Hello, I do not think "Search LAN" works when you click "Use predefined hosts". Settings: Use relay server when required: OFF Use tracker server: OFF Search LAN: ON Search DHT network: OFF Use predefined hosts: ON with 2 remote hosts If I add a predefined host with the local name (DEVICE-X) then it will find that host on the LAN, but otherwise it does not seem to look for them. Regards, David
  13. Great! Hope it will come with more GUI updates... I am preparing a list of things I would like to see to post as "Wish List". But of course! :-) I tried everything... to no joy. My configuration is with "lan_encrypt_data = false", but changing it to true in all clients did not have any effect. At the end I entered the local hostname and port on the hosts list and that did the trick. So it looks like as if the search LAN without tracker does not work. Regards, David
  14. I totally agree. Instead of removing the path and adding some icons it would have been much better if the allow the list to be sorted, or if they showed the folders and devices in a sortable tree-like structure. + Folder 1 | ----- Device 1 (IP:Port) | ----- Device 2 (IP:Port) + Folder 2 | ----- Device 1 (IP:Port) | ----- Device 3 (IP:Port) Regards, David
  15. Updated 3 computers and we hit the first problem... Folders configured to only "Search LAN" (tracker disabled), each computer only sees 2 (out of 10) folder from each other. Not cool... Folders using tracker or hosts seem to be working. No configuration changes have been made, just update and run BitTorrent Sync. It was working before the update. I hope there is a quick update for this soon...