Andy+
-
Posts
584 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Andy+
-
-
Is also in v2.7.2
-
No, why? If the peers are bidirectional, any files would be delete on the other side, if on your side are moved or deleted.
-
No problem, all partie are understood. For me is the same since approx. a year. Before I test Syncthing only, because was not so good as Resilio. Now, for me, Syncthing is good as Resilio and only feature thing, because both have Bugs. But Support of Syncthing is much better and also the Update cycles.
-
Which exactly processors are in use?
-
I have no claim or something like that and any decisions are also okay. Maybe is the lack of decision-making, its only, really I have no message from this post.
-
I don´t understand, what is your claim or issue. On all my Synology servers, Windows clients, Android devices I also use Syncthing in parallel to Resilio to learn, what are the differences, advantages etc. of both. If I have any problems with Resilio (as with Android APP in the past), I switch to Syncthing and try to solve the problem and switch back or not.
-
Maybe is possible to use a x86/x64 based package and open it with 7-ZIP and modify the INFO to add the "Geminilake" at the arch section. Then store it and make a test. But not Unzip it for modification.
I have not tested with Resilio, was another software.
-
On 7/13/2020 at 5:48 PM, laurin1 said:
I've had numerous issues with 2.7.1, including this one:
The only solution I found was downgrading to 2.7.0.
My problems started with a database error. I removed and added back the folder in question, but never would finish on all machines.
A similar issue I have also with one of my 3 Synology´s since a couple of days, maybe since running v2.7.1 and the Synology is connected over the Internet to all my other 2 Synology´s and other devices. All my devices with v2.7.2 are running, but this one have a problem. The connection to this Synology is good, all peers are connected, but nothing with syncing. Also after stopping Resilio, deleting the database, starting Resilio again, the same situation.
To help me, I run for the relevant peers Syncthing, so in the moment I have a solution, but is not the final. Up to v2.6.4 or 2.7.0 I had never problems, its not clear for me, what I can doe.
-
In such cases, it’s normally not a issue of Resilio. In your case it seems that the content is blocked for Resilio and is more a thing of the right permissions.
To fix this again, I recommend resetting recursiv the System-ACLs inside of the related folders for all content with root:root, octal 0777 and then resetting the ACLs back in the system by inheriting them from the root folder back into the files and subdirectories. Then it should work again.
-
In the same way is possible in Syncthing peers.
-
To manage all files and folders, Resilio and also similar software needs round about 0,8-1 kB per file and folder. Is not enough RAM installed, the over must we swapped with the HDD´s. In this direction you are right, if the files and folders are to much, it cant manage.
-
Maybe try v2.7.1.
-
Yes, this feature would be good to work efficient.
-
The first thing to check is whether the new router has all the necessary ports open. These normally have 5 digits. As a rule, UPnP can be activated for this, but fixed ports can also be defined and released for this. However, UPnP is more convenient.
The second step is to check whether a firewall, which could also be at the service provider, prevents a port connection, often it is restrictive firewalls. For this reason, I use Syncthing for restrictive firewalls, because Syncthing http:// and https://, meaning port resolution 80 and 443 is also mastered, Resilio cannot do that, at least for me so far not understandable.
Then the settings would have to be checked again to see whether all relevant tracker servers that are required for the connection are activated. But often such problems are related to the ports.
-
In the file /etc/group you find the entrance
administrators:x:101:admin,rslsync
or similar, it means, that rslsync is a member of admins and need therefore not to enable the default admin user. Only be sure, that "administrators" have full permissions in the shared folders of DSM.
-
I'm basically just as concerned. I had some problems, which is why I also looked at Syncthing...
I don't want to give up so quickly. After I had properly compared, I deleted all identities and databases, renewed the identities, the indexings and databases were newly created. Since then, the Android APP has been running well again.
Nevertheless, I was to some extent forced to use syncthing in advance, as there were non-solvable problems with the Android APP. Another fact is that one of my Synology's is located in a location with low internet bandwidth.
So I was not only forced to use Syncthing, but also parallel to Resilio, in that peers were interlinked. This works very well with the matching ignore pattern and I will preemptively use it and see what the future holds.
-
Normally, Yes. If your have a license and use a advanced folder, or better call it peer, the new connection from the Smartphone appears in all connect ex devices. Otherwise you must exchange the peer key manually.
-
2 hours ago, Synogeek said:
rename the folder prior to sharing to /user1/home/user1 instead of /user1/home/Drive?
Yes, only that is surely possible
-
On 8/8/2014 at 3:01 PM, piotrnik said:
really cool feature, especially since many of the items I've synced are exactly that - photos, movies, music, disk images, etc - that rarely change
Same to me for finished projects, photos, movies, music, software packages, etc.
-
To rename from v2.7.x right click on a peer and choose settings and most above you see the peer name and a little pencil on right side. Click on it and chosse a new name.
For ignoring #recycle maybe try ?recycle or *recycle, I think some tests are needed for that
https://help.resilio.com/hc/en-us/articles/205458165-Ignoring-files-in-Sync-Ignore-List-
-
If selective sync is not used, a 1:1 copy is made on the connected peer side. On all 2 peers are a synced dataset. With 3 peers it is triple. That is so wanted.
If selective sync is set, there are no copies on the affected peers, only the directory structure and placeholders for the files. Then the files or directories must be activated if the files are to be physically available on the respective peer. That is also wanted.
To share something, it doesn't have to be an extended folder, you can also share standard folders. But then the keys have to be exchanged.
Maybe you are working intensively on the documentation.
-
6 minutes ago, tannaroo said:
Resilio on a RPI4
Its maybe a challenge for RPI because of resources Resilio needs, if you have a lot of files and folders. But at first that needs some tests by you.
-
14 minutes ago, tannaroo said:
using openmediavault v5
with which NAS, it means hardware?
-
So I have understood you have on Resilio side
/sync/Music/Music
/sync/Music/Master
/sync/Music/TestSync
so on server side you have
/srv/dev-disk-by-label-Hippo/Music/Music/Music
/srv/dev-disk-by-label-Hippo/Music/Music/Master
/srv/dev-disk-by-label-Hippo/Music/Music/TestSync
That is what I see with the sequence
/srv/dev-disk-by-label-Hippo/Music:/sync
Synology Packages | SPK´s
in Sync for NAS (Network Attached Storage)
Posted
Now we have v2.7.2 and the official Synology version still is v2.6.2 but is not understood from me, since all the packages for
88f628x
alpine/alpine4k
armada37xx
armada375
armada38x
armadaxp
avoton
apollolake
braswell
broadwell
bromolow
cedarview
comcerto2k
denverton
evansport
monaco
rtd1296
x86
x64
as v2.7.2 are stored in
https://help.resilio.com/hc/en-us/articles/206664850