kos13

Could you also PM me, to localize issue with files not being synchronized?

Hi, These messages could appear during the handshake, before peers exchange with the encryption keys. Nothing wrong here.

We will address this in next build. If folder can't be find, we won't treat this as deleted. Thank you for report.

Hi, We would like to create a list of NAS modeles that is supported by Sync. If you started Sync on Nas, please respond to this topic. Sync confirmed to be running on: Synology: Ds110j, Ds210j. DS211j, DS213+ (custom build), DS211, DS411j, DS712+, DS713+, DS411 slim, DS-411+,DS411+II, DS412+ QNAP: TurboNAS TS-459 Pro II, TS410, TS-212, TS219, TS-110, TS412, TS-210, Western Digital: MyBook Live WDBACG0020HCH-00 iOmega: IX2-200 ZyXel: NSA310б NSA-221 D-Link: DNS-320 Raspberry Pi Doesn't work on DLink NAS DNS-323 Please provide installation steps, this will significantly help other users.

We got it. We'll do it. This year.

Hi Vadim, thank you for a report. We are aware of this issue and chasing it. In worst cases synchronization will happen 10 minutes after the change. Meanwhile, could you please PM me, so we could get logs and analyze them. Thanks for the report.

Bug is fixed. Will be released in next build - beginning of next week.

Just for information: Issue was with router port mapping, Sync mapped the port and rest ports were forgotten by router.

Sync doesn't work well with removable drives right now. So when it can't access folder, it assumes everything was deleted. We will address this. So, you linked two computers: one with empty folder another one with files in folder, nothing happens. Only new files that are added will be synchronized. Is that right? We are going to revisit the way we configure Linux client in next version. This will be addressed too. Sync doesn't delete empty directories for now, this will be fixed. As well as the Secret. Thank you for your reports.

I fully understand your concerns, and agree that sharing secret over insecure media like email or im, makes it vulnerable. Let me give you some background on how we come with the idea of secret. Usually consumer applications use some sort of login/password combination to identify user and create groups of users. In case of Sync we don't have any central server that do such linking, we don't need ability to recover passwords, authenticate users. So we decided not to use login/password, but rather find some other way - that will be clear enough to users. So this way we come with the Secret idea. Why we do understand all security risks, it was interesting to see how people will understand this concept and that concept will it be clear to them. Seems that the concept of Secret is fine with users, so we will tighten security. I can't tell now how it will be done, this is still in development. But all your concerns will be addressed. To clarify complexity that we have, we don't have master-client relation in the system, so implementing key management where any computer is master and can come and go at any time, is something less trivial than master-slave key management.

We will look to that. At the moment I can't say anything definite.

No limit, should work.

Added to feature list. However indexing of 280 Gb shouldn't take 70 hours, we will check that.

Thank you for your report. Sync currently sees no files, when drive is not connected, so it deletes its index information. We will look to this problem.

We have few issues around unicode file names, so "фото" fits to that case.

Why you need to have a space at the end of dir? I am asking this because we run some filename check before accepting file for synchronization, to make sure we will be able to create it later. On windows, for example you can't create file with the space at the end.

We will do.

Yes, empty directories and 0 size files are not synchronized yet. We are thinking about not physically deleting file, just renaming it. Looks like a good feature request.

Do I understand correctly that you try to use Sync in some organization?

This is why the software is in pre-alpha, not everything works as designed We will take care of it.

Don't get me wrong, we do understand importance of the diff and its advantages. And actually Sync support delta copying if file size stays the same. However implementing rsync like diff in distributed environment without dedicated server, is kind of complex task.

was solved with custom build for libc

For now complete directory. Selective syncing will be added later. Not the most difficult part of the product

Could you please restart browser and try http://ip:8888/gui/

Sync doesn't have a merge functionality, latest modified file will be distributed across all computers.