kos13 Posted February 1, 2013 Report Posted February 1, 2013 Hi,We would like to create a list of NAS modeles that is supported by Sync. If you started Sync on Nas, please respond to this topic.Sync confirmed to be running on:Synology: Ds110j, Ds210j. DS211j, DS213+ (custom build), DS211, DS411j, DS712+, DS713+, DS411 slim, DS-411+,DS411+II, DS412+QNAP: TurboNAS TS-459 Pro II, TS410, TS-212, TS219, TS-110, TS412, TS-210,Western Digital: MyBook Live WDBACG0020HCH-00iOmega: IX2-200ZyXel: NSA310б NSA-221D-Link: DNS-320Raspberry Pi Doesn't work onDLink NAS DNS-323Please provide installation steps, this will significantly help other users. Quote
MicEdwards Posted February 1, 2013 Report Posted February 1, 2013 Just wanted to let you know that I have SyncApp_arm running on a Raspberry Pi on the Raspbian Linux distribution.I know it's not strictly a NAS, but I am using it as one ... Quote
iMok Posted February 4, 2013 Report Posted February 4, 2013 A FreeBSD binary would bump this list with the most spread NAS software: FreeNAS Quote
kos13 Posted February 4, 2013 Author Report Posted February 4, 2013 We will check what it means to run Sync on FreeBSD. Quote
rtwpsom2 Posted February 9, 2013 Report Posted February 9, 2013 Western Digital MyBook Live WDBACG0020HCH-00It has been working fine in the tests I have run. Quote
bigtower Posted February 9, 2013 Report Posted February 9, 2013 Ok on Synology DS411j Thxver 1.0.75 : ok but lost config Quote
bigtower Posted February 9, 2013 Report Posted February 9, 2013 Nok on Synology RS407 RS407 Marvell Orion mv5281 ARMver 1.0.75 : NOK (error 126 ???) Quote
danielmuller Posted February 22, 2013 Report Posted February 22, 2013 ver 1.0.75: Synology 210+ (ppc GNU/Linux synology_ppc853x_210+)NOK: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.4' not found Quote
kos13 Posted February 22, 2013 Author Report Posted February 22, 2013 I don't know why Synology uses so old libc. we need newer one to use ionotify, to have realtime information about changed files. We will look to the option to release a build without ionotify, directory will be rescanned every n seconds. Then we will run on older versions. Quote
PeterVerhees Posted February 22, 2013 Report Posted February 22, 2013 Synology DS1010+ Not OK. (DSM 4.2 Beta)Synology DS508 Not OK. (DSM 4.0 - Latest)Also Libc Issues.I can test with a statically compiled version of SyncApp if you want. I believe this will circumvent the libc problems altogether, howevery I'm not sure about that.I've also looked into the possibility of upgrading my libc on the synology. Luckily it was my test system, things broke beyond repair. Had to reinstall. Quote
kos13 Posted February 22, 2013 Author Report Posted February 22, 2013 We do have statically compiled libc, however it needs to be supported by OS. In this case OS does't support it. We will look to option to disable ionotify to support older versions. But it seems we will need support from you in testing all variations, since it we won't be able to test all combinations. Quote
PeterVerhees Posted February 22, 2013 Report Posted February 22, 2013 Do you mean ionotify or inotify?Inotify is supported by the OS. The kernel supports it and a compiled version of inotail works as well. Quote
stallemanden Posted February 24, 2013 Report Posted February 24, 2013 I have been trying to get the SyncApp working on my Synology DS-712+, but as it seems to be a well known issue, this is running with a somewhat old version of GLIBC.Today i've been giving it a go at compiling version 2.4, but it seems to be not as easy as one could have hoped for.I will try to keep looking for a solution, undtil a upgraded ipkg package becomes available to support the CPU in the DS-712+ Quote
gabor Posted March 9, 2013 Report Posted March 9, 2013 Glad to hear that I will be able to test on my Raspberry Pi. Looks like it is the cheapest NAS like option. Quote
ryanhaver Posted March 25, 2013 Report Posted March 25, 2013 Has anyone been able to verify that SyncApp works on some of the higher end Synology models; specifically the RS2122+ which uses and Intel Atom D2700? Quote
makoki Posted April 18, 2013 Report Posted April 18, 2013 Tried it in IX2-200 and works but seems to only sync one way works great! OSX 10.6.8 synching against NAS Iomega IX-200 fine Quote
trikerman Posted April 18, 2013 Report Posted April 18, 2013 Fully working in two Zyxel NSA310.Great job! Quote
genious Posted April 18, 2013 Report Posted April 18, 2013 Waoo. Simple. Beautiful.Successfully installed and tested sync on 2 Synology NAS DS712+ and DS713+ (both x86_64).Special "sync synology build 1.0.116".Worked like a charm between 2 optical fiber connections, each capable of uploading @50mb/sAs I ran merly 5.5MB/s, eg. around 40 mb/s, i guess the protoocol is working great Continue testing but this sounds very promising. Quote
eseelke Posted April 18, 2013 Report Posted April 18, 2013 How do you install BitTorrent Sync on a Zyxel NAS device? Quote
kos13 Posted April 19, 2013 Author Report Posted April 19, 2013 How do you install BitTorrent Sync on a Zyxel NAS device?Could you try to contact trikerman, he installed it on Zyxel? Quote
eseelke Posted April 19, 2013 Report Posted April 19, 2013 I was able to get this working with my Zyxel NSA-221.1. InstappFFP - http://zyxel.nas-cen.../wiki/FFP-stick - this must be installed and setup first.2. Copy btsync file that is located in the ARM compressed file to /ffp/bin using telnet. - http://syncapp.bitto...sync_arm.tar.gz3. Create file /ffp/start/btsync.sh with the following text- this is to make it auto start when the NAS is rebooted.#!/ffp/bin/sh/ffp/bin/btsyncThen make btsync.sh executable with chmod.chmod u+x /ffp/start/btsync.shHope this helps someoneEddie Quote
eseelke Posted April 19, 2013 Report Posted April 19, 2013 I found an easier way to install ffp that does not require the use of a usb drive.http://zyxel.nas-central.org/wiki/FFP_as_zypkgEddie Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.