• Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won



About Xanza

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    New York City
  1. No, this is fully compliant with US HIPPA laws. Additionally, the servers aren't net-facing and are specifically denied requests to the open Internet -- both ways. This means that even though the server is connected to a network that has the ability to access the open web, any and all requests that are non-local are denied at the hardware level. This means that you have to manually update the client but there is a zero percent chance that your data can be accessed encrypted or decrypted from anything that's not within the local network. Moving from there it's up to you to secure your local bus
  2. Just tested on 32bit Windows Vista via VM, no issues, installs no problems. Ensure you're right clicking to install as an administrator.
  3. A linux system admin could run BTSync via Docker and connect it to your www directory via shared hosting (assuming you're using shared hosting). It would be tedious, and time consuming and I doubt you would find someone willing to do it. But sure, it's totally possible. BTSync would download your entire root web hosting folder and you simply add your files to your BTSync directory on your local machine and they're synced to a web facing directory which would then be accessible (after transfer) via anyone on the open web.
  4. You could add the external hard drive via samba as a network resource and map the drive as you would a normal hard drive, then simply setup BTSync on the local machine and have it sync to the network folder. But regardless, you still need to satisfy the necessities of the BTSync program, which requires two devices to create a viable network connection. So technically yes, this can be achieved, but only if you have more than one computer, or device compatible with BTSync, and is able to map networked drives.
  5. This is a limitation of the Raspberry Pi unit itself. The internal processor is unable to handle the needed calculations to chunk the data and send it downstream.
  6. I do work for a doctor in my area (D.C.) who was working with a software suite called ChiroTouch. The program stores all patient data in a database located on the local hard drive. Naturally the doctor was worried about data corruption and loss and was in the market for a backup solution. The ChiroTouch software comes with a paid backup solution to a secure cloud server run by the ChiroTouch dev team, however, it costs $59.00 per month per computer (4 computers or $236/mo or $2832/year). Being a small practice this type of expense is prohibitive; enter BTSync. Because of New York state HIPPA l
  7. I can easily see this as becoming a very influential project in the near future. Excellent job! Preview for anyone Interested: My Vole Key: BL6YGCCGBAA25P3JB5OSHNTPUO3RX43U6
  8. Any time you have multiple antivirus running at once, you'll have network issues. Especially antivirus with integrated firewalls, which is why I suggested these procedures.
  9. It's the environment, and you've pretty much proven it by adding that Google Drive is also experiencing issues. Try disabling any and all antivirus protection or associated firewalls (including windows firewall) and try again. If that doesn't work, attempt to manually open the applicable ports on your router, restart your computer, disable antivirus and firewalls again, and try again. If none of the above solutions work for you, then it's possible that either that's all the bandwidth that you currently have allocated to that PC (via QOS) or some other rate limiting program, such as torrents, u
  10. I currently have a contact with OVH and many other dedicated server providers to provide mass storage, however, I'm waiting for either multi user support or for BTSync to drop from alpha.
  11. Although I don't speak for the devs, the program itself is too alpha to be worrying about translations at the moment. (I'm pretty sure). This issue has been stressed many times, however, so I'm sure the team is beginning to realize that this milestone is becoming to become more and more crucial. I would suggest, however, that you amend your original post with the languages in which you are supremely fluent and would be able to make a 100% translation for. This would help the team recognize for which languages they're able to translate into first.
  12. Potentially means nothing to me. Prove beyond a reasonable doubt that they are using 128-bit AES instead of 256-bit AES and I'll demand an explanation -- not before. Since you're not a first hand programmer, and are not fluent in the way that the application was designed, or released, I'm more inclined to believe the original statements of 256-bit AES in lieu of 128-bit AES; as that's what I've been told and have not been told otherwise since. Secondly, any cypher mode could potentially, in the eyes of the programmers, put the entire protocol at risk if released. Although it does look suspicio
  13. You're going to have to be patient. There is also a thread open about this in the BTSync Insiders forum; we're awaiting reply from the devs. For the meantime, you should assume that any and all prestanding terms of service related to any and all bittorrent products are concurrent and in effect.
  14. Задавать вопросы на английском языке было бы самое лучшее для вас сделать, так как большинство на этом форуме, вероятно, только говорить по-английски.