• Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Andy+

  1. As tools I use the Synology Filestation and WinSCP look at "" dwon to "Changing Properties of Files and Folders" to see the menu to set the above.
  2. Maybe the problem has to do with Synology’s partly strange ACL system. In my opinion maybe this have nothing to doe directly with Resilio. However, in most cases I can remove such things with a standard procedure. In such cases, I’ve deleted the Synology ACLs by setting the owner and group to root and octal rights to 0777 for all files and subdirectories in the affected peers. Then I go back to Synology DSM into filestation and inherit the permissions again in these peers in all files and subdirectories. This is kind of a standard procedure if I have any kind of permission issu
  3. Also here, from time to time doesnt start from boot on my DS415+
  4. I think, Resilio is installed in any condition. In which way you had installed, as service or normal? And other websites are visible properly?
  5. Unfortunately there seems to be a little bit less staff and that is counterproductive.
  6. I think, at least is understood from all people. But what the people see regarding activities to solve Bugs and to have regular Updates etc. is another thing.
  7. Depending on the OS on your PC you find a working folder, in which files like *.db and *.db-wal are stored. Stop Resilio and delete such files and start again. Then a new indexing is starting.
  8. Regarding the confusion of the DSM 7 permissions (root/user) during the installation process I got today the follow message from Synology: Start Yes, you may continue using root privilege ONLY if you apply a token from us to bypass the lower privilege setting this time round, without which, your package installation would fail in DSM7.0 Beta. As mentioned in point 2 in my previous email: To avoid future update issues, It is highly recommended that your package can be modified to match our new lower privilege framework. Please develop according to the new develope
  9. If nobody can help, best to contact Support directly:
  10. Doe you use version 2.6.4 from Google platform? Which Smartphone you have and Android version? Are the peers connected in a good condition and environment with good perfomance? Maybe a permission problem.
  11. This kind of support is usual here. Maybe use Syncthing, if nothing runs. But unfortunately there is no ready installation package, maybe look at package center of QNAP, but surely is a old version and you can update to current v1.9.0
  12. I think, is time for update
  13. I´m in touch with Synology and got today the follow message about current version of third-party packages would be incompatible: Thanks for your continuing interest in developing with Synology. We are planning for a major version update to DSM7.0 Beta soon. Due to DSM 7.0 having quite a few adjustments to the framework, current version of third-party packages would be incompatible with the new DSM 7.0 version. Hence, we are providing you with a new set of Developer's Guide, Toolkit and relevant resources, so that your future package can be compatible with our upcoming DSM release
  14. In this moment the implementation is in work, maybe it comes with v1.10
  15. If you read the comments in Google for the Smartphone APP, the problems are very similar:
  16. The question is, if you have anything changed in the work load, it means more files, peers etc. Otherwise maybe went back. With v2.7.2 on all my devices I have no problems, but if I follow the threads here it seems v2.7.2 have some bugs.
  17. No, unfortunately not. In the general forum there is always a hint about the development, e.g.: However, the update cycles are quite long (too long! 😎), so that it is sufficient to check every months, or weeks for the not so patient 😇.
  18. First of all, it has to be said that Syncthing is a tool more for technicians. It surely has some goodies in the GUI, but something like ticking autostart, that's too much of a diva for that. Nevertheless, there is an entire website in the documentation for autostarting on various platforms. It is not true that the GUI of Syncthing is not being optimized, it just has not fundamentally changed. But that is also not the case with Resilio. The difference between BTsync v1.4.111 and Resilio v2.7.2 is visible, but this is also the case between Syncthing v0.10 and v1.8.0. NAS clearly fall
  19. Maybe check the packages here:
  20. Goodsync and Resilio (same issue for Syncthing) are different in some feature points. Goodsync is not a P2P software as Resilio, is more a very good automatic FreeFileSync, I mean that with simple words. To have a view to your points, so is answered is not implemented now. If you want, use Syncthing, which have in the Peer settings of the GUI a window for that. Normally each 600 sec. you have a new indexing. Otherwise use Powersettings.
  21. Resilio wastes great potential, that's the users. We are in a similar community here, whether licenses have been bought or not. And users like to test too. With this, software can be developed much faster, better and more efficiently than without it. That's why Syncthing has gotten so good so quickly. Nobody does that with professional corporate customers, they expect something for the money. It is foreseeable that Resilio will be left behind, as there is also work on features etc. and the defectors there will also ask for selective sync etc. or suggest this as a feature request.
  22. I can understand that capacities have to be used carefully. But Resilio has a crisis of confidence in relation of the users. I keep seeing new users in the Syncthing forum who come from here frustrated. Anyone who asks qualified questions there will be looked after by at least 3 maintainers or software developers and, if necessary, further contributors. Nothing really works here in the Resilio Forum, just announcements and promises, but ultimately far too little is happening. I do not understand that. I can testify that Syncthing still has its small bugs, but now runs just as well as Resi
  23. I got no reaction from any member of Resilio. I dont understand that.
  24. Maybe went back to v2.7.1 or v2.7.0, since it could be a bug.