Andy+

Such issues are not Sync related. Maybe there are settings in the DSM are forbitten the access. If you get no solution for that, delete the ACLs on terminal and set them new in the DSM.

@Daria same Problem here!

For above actions of Daria you need WinSCP or PuTTY or a similar tool to modify the file. Otherwise, its ones more time for Updates of the packages, @Daria.

Look at my Post of 8.1.2021

Nobody says Resilio is bad. In addition, every software has its advantages. It is Resilio's own fault for scaring off its users. However, what is currently going on in terms of updates and handling even of license users is not understandable.

You are completely free of drives. If you want to keep that separate, only two kinds of directories are required. That is completely sufficient.

Local Files enables synchronization on the local device, i.e. from directory A to directory B on device C. This was previously not possible without the feature, since only from device C with directory A to to device D with directory B.

Thats my opinion. If you look in the Syncthing forum, more and more people come from here. "I have left Resilio....", "I come from Resilio ...." etc. etc. .... No more comments.

English please. What is with your peers?

I've always been an advocate of Resilio and have been using the software productively since BTsync v1.4.111. That was the first really good version of BTsync / Resilio. So I've been an active user of Resilio for years. I have also some licenses. More since of interest and playing around, I started experimenting with Syncthing years ago, as this software is also available for a wide variety of platforms. I quickly saw that each software has advantages and disadvantages over the other. Both are good in principle. Resilio is peer-oriented, Syncthing is device-oriented. This primarily gives an indication of how flexible the respective packages are when it comes to file sharing. With Resilio it is more easy to share a peer, with Syncthing it is always also the device, which is a bit more cumbersome, but the result is the same in the end. More and more through circumstances, but also through this strange behavior of Resilio, which has been foreseeable for some time, I have come further and further in the direction of Syncthing and since a few months now I have been using Syncthing productively everywhere. Resilio is still running on my Synology servers, but without data exchange. I would therefore advise you to experiment with Syncthing and make tests in your environment parallel to Resilio, then you can see for yourself how it works.

Exactly, what I mean. This would be a good way also for Resilio. But it is not a good way to want to save in order to only fix half of the bugs and in the end also lose the license customers. What kind of business model is that?

I don't think that's a good portrayal. There has been a significant decrease in activities from Resilio side on Home and Pro since today. In my opinion, they are primarily working on Connect and thus neglecting the pro license customers. It is true that update cycles are not the measure of all things, but regular updates at short intervals are better than what Resilio does and then only solves half of it. There are some known bugs that are clearly reported here. The Android APP, still version 2.6.4, is also coming more and more into focus due to the progress in the field of Android development. Don't get me wrong. Resilio is still an excellent software, but it is getting more and more on the defensive against its competition, especially Syncthing. And that's exactly what shouldn't have been. Resilio is still strong in features, but technically speaking, Syncthing has already left Resilio behind. And the recipe is simple. Close exchange with the community and constantly optimizing, a final every four weeks, etc., Syncthing goes better and better. You don't believe how many users are already there from here, precisely because movement and seriousness can be seen. Because the users notice that someone is taking care of the problems. In return, how often can I read here in the last few weeks and months that even the support of Resilio is no longer answering. I think that's poor, especially towards the well-meaning license buyers, I also have several licenses. Well, what do you think I am mainly using today?

Doe you use a lisenced Version? If yes, you have the possibility to connect to your Master device and you get a list of possible peers to connect. If there is no list, there is no Master connection. The second issue with (1) is normal. Only delete this ending and connect.

In such cases I use the DSM Tasplaner to start a service.

That Resilio work smootly a internet connection is needed. Doe you have that?

Any news about this and other new features?

Any news about SPK for DSM 7?

No comment of staff ....

Any news about DSM 7 packages?

Maybe is a RAM issue. The DS214SE is a low powered DS with low RAM recourses and to manage the big file could be a problem. What device you have "macjonte"?

Any news about v2.7.x / v2.8.x?

I never have in the past a similar issue. Is strange. Best to make a ticket, since the Resilio staff are not active here.

I also use Synology Servers and manage all with my Desktop clients. To connect the GUI the Standard is for Port no. 28888 and IP 192.168.xxx.xxx so Finally I connect with http://192.168.xxx.xxx:28888 At desktop is the same http://127.0.0.1:8888 so port here is 8888.

Usually is possible. To limit the data transfer to the phone is possible to use selective sync. Maybe a test would be good.

If you look to Resilio Connect you can see that the development is working https://connect.resilio.com/hc/en-us/articles/360003977840-Change-log Currently Connect is in version 2.12. What I know, the Connect version 2.7.2 has the same or a similar engine as Home/Pro version 2.7.2. If you see that Connect is a commercial product is clear that the focus is on that.